Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 09:26 PM Dec 2017

Bitcoin's horrific energy footprint

An index from cryptocurrency analyst Alex de Vries, aka Digiconomist, estimates that with prices the way they are now, it would be profitable for Bitcoin miners to burn through over 24 terawatt-hours of electricity annually as they compete to solve increasingly difficult cryptographic puzzles to "mine" more Bitcoins. That's about as much as Nigeria, a country of 186 million people, uses in a year.


This averages out to a shocking 215 kilowatt-hours (KWh) of juice used by miners for each Bitcoin transaction (there are currently about 300,000 transactions per day). Since the average American household consumes 901 KWh per month, each Bitcoin transfer represents enough energy to run a comfortable house, and everything in it, for nearly a week. On a larger scale, De Vries' index shows that bitcoin miners worldwide could be using enough electricity to at any given time to power about 2.26 million American homes.

(snip)

That means that, at a minimum, worldwide Bitcoin mining could power the daily needs of 821,940 average American homes.

Put another way, global Bitcoin mining represents a minimum of 77KWh of energy consumed per Bitcoin transaction. Even as an unrealistic lower boundary, this figure is high: As senior economist Teunis Brosens from Dutch bank ING wrote, it's enough to power his own home in the Netherlands for nearly two weeks.


More at: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ywbbpm/bitcoin-mining-electricity-consumption-ethereum-energy-climate-change
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bitcoin's horrific energy footprint (Original Post) Binkie The Clown Dec 2017 OP
The key word is "estimates". Without something to back it up, his opinion and nothing more. tonyt53 Dec 2017 #1
more info here, looks pretty bad Blues Heron Dec 2017 #2
Bitcoin needs to die, but not by prosecution. hunter Dec 2017 #3
 

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)
1. The key word is "estimates". Without something to back it up, his opinion and nothing more.
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 10:05 PM
Dec 2017

No, I do not own any nor do I know anyone that does. However, those numbers are unrealistic.

Blues Heron

(5,940 posts)
2. more info here, looks pretty bad
Sun Dec 3, 2017, 10:41 PM
Dec 2017
https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption


Value
Bitcoin's current estimated annual electricity consumption* (TWh) 31.05
Annualized global mining revenues $9,701,548,326
Annualized estimated global mining costs $1,552,445,945
Country closest to Bitcoin in terms of electricity consumption Morocco
Estimated electricity used over the previous day (KWh) 85,065,531
Implied Watts per GH/s 0.298
Total Network Hashrate in PH/s (1,000,000 GH/s) 12,074
Electricity consumed per transaction (KWh) 261.00
Number of U.S. households that could be powered by Bitcoin 2,874,900
Number of U.S. households powered for 1 day by the electricity consumed for a single transaction 8.81
Bitcoin's electricity consumption as a percentage of the world's electricity consumption 0.14%

hunter

(38,326 posts)
3. Bitcoin needs to die, but not by prosecution.
Mon Dec 4, 2017, 12:59 PM
Dec 2017

Trying to regulate it, or outlawing it, would only make it more attractive to those who believe they are getting away with something.

A horrible natural death for Bitcoin would be ideal, one that gives cryptocurrencies a bad reputation forevermore.

Monetizing specific numbers that have certain computationally difficult properties was a brilliant idea, but there's a reason the creator of this Ponzi scheme didn't want to put his name on it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Bitcoin's horrific energy...