Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumTar Creek - OK Ground Zero For Toxins - Now Snaring Pruitt With Cover-Up Accusations
PICHER, Okla. Tar Creek, Oklahoma, is breathtaking in a terrible way: At one time the worlds deepest source of lead and zinc, the three-town region is now a cratered landscape so poisonous that no one, aside from 10 holdouts, can live there. Mountains of ashlike chat, a toxic residue from lead-zinc milling, rise majestically among the remains of homes torn from their foundations. Abandoned pets forage around the ruins. A childs teddy bear lies sprawled in a ghostly living room. A gorilla statue fronts an empty high school, atop a sign proclaiming 1A Football State Champs, 1984.
Tar Creek is also part of the environmental legacy of one of the statesand nationsleading politicians, Senator Jim Inhofe, and his longtime ally, Scott Pruitt, the former Oklahoma attorney general who is now head of President Donald Trumps Environmental Protection Agency. After the EPA struggled to clean up the area, in 2006, Inhofe endorsed a plan in which a trust overseen by local citizens would use federal dollars to purchase homes and businesses in the toxic region so residents could move elsewhere. Then, when the plan proved so problematic that it spawned more than a half-dozen civil lawsuits and an audit into possible criminal wrongdoing, Pruitt, as the states attorney general, invoked an exception to state freedom-of-information laws to keep the audit from being an open public record.
Now, that decision is coming into new light as many Oklahomans clamor for the audit to be released, suggesting that its revelations will prove embarrassing to Inhofe, who played a key role in designing the buyout plan, and cast doubt on Pruitts decision not to move forward with charges. Last week, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit called the Campaign for Accountability raised the stakes even further, filing suit in Oklahoma courts to force the release of the audit. If you take a look at Scott Pruitts record, you see a general disregard for transparency, said Daniel Stevens, the groups executive director. I dont think its outside our bounds to say that Pruitt is trying to hide evidence of criminal wrongdoing. Pruitt, in an interview, dismissed the idea that he was covering anything up, saying his former offices grand jury unit reviewed the audit and determined that no charges were warranted. He said he declined to make it public because he didnt want innocent people to be besmirched, even though the auditor rejected that reasoning and maintained it should be a public document. It was important to protect the individuals reputation that were in that investigation, Pruitt said.
EDIT
But many residents of the Tar Creek area, who gave up their homes in a buyout they considered both coercive and corrupt, continue to blame Pruitt for the fact that no one was prosecuted. They described a program so rife with good-old-boy corruption that certain individuals received outsize payoffs while some homeowners got so little they couldnt relocate anywhere nearby; meanwhile, they said, the people hired to demolish the homes received inflated contracts through a flawed process. We were lied to and deceived from Day One, said Gloria Workman, who said her son has learning disabilities from growing up in the polluted zone of Tar Creek, which had lead-poisoning levels in children that were three times higher than those registered in Flint, Michigan, during the peak of its recent water crisis. Not only were we losing our homes, we were raped in the process.
EDIT
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/12/06/scott-pruitt-tar-creek-oklahoma-investigation-215854