Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe Doomsday Machine: The High Price of Nuclear Energy, the World's Most Dangerous Fuel
The Doomsday Machine: The High Price of Nuclear Energy, the World's Most Dangerous Fuel
Today, there are over 400 nuclear reactors in 31 countries, including France, Brazil, India, the UK, and Canada. Proponents claim that nuclear power is the only viable alternative to fossil fuels given rising energy consumption and the looming threat of global warming, and are pushing for an even greater investment. Here, energy economist Andrew McKillop and social scientist Martin Cohen argue that the nuclear power dream being sold to us is pure fantasy. Debunking the multi-layered myth that nuclear energy is cheap, clean and safe, they demonstrate how landscapes are ravaged in search of the elusive yellow cake to fuel the reactors, and how energy companies and politicians rarely discuss the true costs of nuclear power plants - from the subsidies that build the infrastructure to the unspoken guarantee that the public will pick up the cleanup cost in the event of a meltdown, which can easily top a hundred billion dollars. In the wake of the meltdown at Japan's Fukushima power plant, the future of nuclear energy is again uncertain; this is a timely and hard-hitting look at why its costs are simply too high for humanity.
Today, there are over 400 nuclear reactors in 31 countries, including France, Brazil, India, the UK, and Canada. Proponents claim that nuclear power is the only viable alternative to fossil fuels given rising energy consumption and the looming threat of global warming, and are pushing for an even greater investment. Here, energy economist Andrew McKillop and social scientist Martin Cohen argue that the nuclear power dream being sold to us is pure fantasy. Debunking the multi-layered myth that nuclear energy is cheap, clean and safe, they demonstrate how landscapes are ravaged in search of the elusive yellow cake to fuel the reactors, and how energy companies and politicians rarely discuss the true costs of nuclear power plants - from the subsidies that build the infrastructure to the unspoken guarantee that the public will pick up the cleanup cost in the event of a meltdown, which can easily top a hundred billion dollars. In the wake of the meltdown at Japan's Fukushima power plant, the future of nuclear energy is again uncertain; this is a timely and hard-hitting look at why its costs are simply too high for humanity.
Contents:
Introduction
Myth 1: Nuclear Energy is the Energy of the Future
Myth 2: Nuclear Power is Green
Myth 3: Nuclear Reactors are Reliable and Safe
Myth 4: Nuclear Energy is Cheap - Too Cheap to Meter
Myth 5: Nuclear Energy Avoids Geopolitics
Myth 6: Nuclear Energy is Very Clean
Myth 7: Nuclear Radiation is Harmless
Myth 8: Everyone is Looking to Invest in Nuclear Energy
http://www.palgrave.com/products/title.aspx?pid=537536
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1340 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Doomsday Machine: The High Price of Nuclear Energy, the World's Most Dangerous Fuel (Original Post)
kristopher
Apr 2012
OP
That goes to yet another nuclear industry myth - renewables are not a viable option
kristopher
Apr 2012
#6
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)1. A masterpiece of coal industry propaganda.
It should definitely be studied by anyone interested in learning how astroturf groups seek to manipulate the left for their profit.
You mean all those grass-roots anti-nuke protesters & activists are just pawns of the coal industry???
OMG!
kristopher
(29,798 posts)4. Says the prolific poster of nuclear industry mythologies
Are you still claiming nuclear plants are $1000/kw?
Or that their safety record is better than wind or solar?
How about Fukushima - still consider that a non-event?
Nostradammit
(2,921 posts)5. Since neither Cohen nor McKillop support the burning of coal for energy
I wonder why you make the claim that this is "coal industry propaganda."
kristopher
(29,798 posts)6. That goes to yet another nuclear industry myth - renewables are not a viable option
Pure BS, of course.
madokie
(51,076 posts)2. There's no cheap, green, safe, clean or harmless when one is talking about nuclear energy n/t