Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

hatrack

(59,587 posts) Wed Jun 6, 2018, 12:19 PM Jun 2018

May 2018 Atmospheric CO2 Content - 411.25 ppm; May 2017 - 409.65 ppm; May 2016 - 407.70 ppm

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/data.html

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

May 2018 Atmospheric CO2 Content - 411.25 ppm; May 2017 - 409.65 ppm; May 2016 - 407.70 ppm (Original Post) hatrack Jun 2018 OP

I tried to get data from that link... GetRidOfThem Jun 2018 #1

different link same info sue4e3 Jun 2018 #2

How odd...it worked just fine for me. hunter Jun 2018 #3

I had it happen once with one of nasa's linked pages . sue4e3 Jun 2018 #4

GetRidOfThem

(869 posts)

1. I tried to get data from that link...

Reply to hatrack (Original post)

Wed Jun 6, 2018, 12:35 PM

Jun 2018

...and it gave me a warning that this data is available only for official use, and the download function did not work. So the link is not really that helpful. (I also deal with carbon issues, so the data would have been very interesting...)

sue4e3

(731 posts)

2. different link same info

Reply to GetRidOfThem (Reply #1)

Wed Jun 6, 2018, 01:24 PM

Jun 2018

https://www.co2.earth/

hunter

(38,317 posts)

3. How odd...it worked just fine for me.

Reply to GetRidOfThem (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 7, 2018, 11:09 AM

Jun 2018

It gives me neat easily imported plain text data with proper commenting.

No warnings at all.

sue4e3

(731 posts)

4. I had it happen once with one of nasa's linked pages .

Reply to hunter (Reply #3)

Thu Jun 7, 2018, 12:28 PM

Jun 2018

I think (for me anyway) That it was my protection programs, the setting were too high . but I didn't know that and nothing told me so . We adjusted the settings and no more problems. Forgive the vocabulary. I am anti-tech savvy. I was just happy it was only me and not NASA's website

Reply to this discussion