New GOP "Openness" To Climate "Solutions": More 20-Year-Old Warmed Over Frank Luntz Bullshit
EDIT
So how do hardcore opponents of climate science and climate action pretend they have solutions? Its all about innovation, as the op-ed makes clear:
We must address climate change in ways that focus on American prosperity and technological capabilities while maintaining Americas leadership in clean and renewable energy innovation. By doubling down on innovation, we can supply the world with new tools to combat emissions.
We should continue to encourage innovation and renewable energy development.
Walden and the others dont support the actual solution to global warming which is deploying clean energy. But, beyond that, they dont even support developing renewable energy. Instead, they want to encourage it. If you are wondering why they repeat the word innovation three times in three sentences and six times in the entire short op-ed its because they are likely following the script laid out by Luntz in an infamous 2002 memo to conservatives and the George W. Bush White House.
In the memo, Luntz explained that the best way to pretend you care about the climate and the environment while opposing regulations that might actually do something to reduce pollution was to talk about technology and innovation. Indeed these words are a cornerstone of Luntzs poll-tested euphemisms for we want to sound like we care about the climate, we just dont want to do anything about it.
In the memos key paragraph, Luntz also repeats the word innovation three times (emphasis in original).
Technology and innovation are the key in arguments on both sides. Global warming alarmists use American superiority in technology and innovation quite effectively in responding to accusations that international agreements such as the Kyoto accord could cost the United States billions. Rather than condemning corporate America the way most environmentalists have done in the past, they attack us for lacking faith in our collective ability to meet any economic challenges presented by environmental changes we make. This should be our argument. We need to emphasize how voluntary innovation and experimentation are preferable to bureaucratic or international intervention and regulation.
EDIT
Thats why the key point for Luntz is that it is voluntary innovation and experimentation. Republican leaders dont actually want to require people to replace dirty energy with clean energy. They just want to keep experimenting. Tragically, however, because weve ignored the science for a quarter century, technology and innovation are not magic wands that can preserve a livable climate without strong government programs to spur deployment such as a price on carbon or carbon pollution standards, which these three politicians have long opposed.
EDIT
https://thinkprogress.org/republican-opposition-green-new-deal-conservative-luntz-innovation-technology-playbook-f6506e98e69f/