Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Wed Jul 8, 2020, 01:43 PM Jul 2020

$7 Billion From Oz Banks To Fossil Energy Projects That Would Wipe Out Planned Carbon Cuts 21 Times

Since the Paris agreement was signed, Australia’s big four banks have financed new fossil fuel projects that would cancel out the national emissions reduction target 21 times over, according to analysis by the activist investor group Market Forces. The analysis, released on Wednesday, shows the banks have loaned $7bn to 33 new or expansionary fossil fuel projects between 2016 and 2019.

Market Forces is concerned that, despite each bank making public their climate commitments and investment policies, the sector still loans almost three times as much to finance fossil fuel projects compared with renewables. The coronavirus recovery is looming as a critical point where financing and policy decisions could redefine the energy market.

Wednesday’s report listed 33 projects financed by the major banks since 2016, including the proposed third stage of the New Acland coalmine in Queensland (ANZ and NAB) and the Pluto 2 LNG train (ANZ and Westpac) which is part of Woodside’s massive Burrup Hub expansion off the Western Australia coast. The projects combined could enable the release of 9bn tonnes of carbon dioxide, which is 21 times the federal government’s planned emissions reduction to 2030.

The Guardian last month reported activist shareholders had written to the Commonwealth Bank querying several recent loans to the gas sector, which appeared inconsistent with the bank’s policies that demand it supports only projects consistent with Paris. The bank’s response was that it considered gas a “transition fuel” that could supplant coal-fired generation. Such claims are increasingly questioned by experts.

EDIT

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/jul/08/australian-banks-undermining-paris-agreement-with-7bn-in-fossil-fuel-loans

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
$7 Billion From Oz Banks To Fossil Energy Projects That Would Wipe Out Planned Carbon Cuts 21 Times (Original Post) hatrack Jul 2020 OP
Great. Now do Lithium, Cobalt & Copper! Budi Jul 2020 #1
 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
1. Great. Now do Lithium, Cobalt & Copper!
Wed Jul 8, 2020, 01:55 PM
Jul 2020
https://www.mining.com/galaxy-moves-sal-de-vida-lithium-project-to-design-phase/
Galaxy moves Sal de Vida lithium project to design phase

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142529071#post5

Tesla, Prius, Cell phone, tablets, computers, medicine, armor plating...the list is long. And the product is toxic to our planet & the people who mine it.

Where does one draw the line on just what human beings are willing to sacrifice for a clean, green world beyond 2020.
Is it all or nothing or is it a more selective decision depending on how & who needs a toxic product.
Who decides?

Just asking.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»$7 Billion From Oz Banks ...