Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,167 posts)
Thu Aug 20, 2020, 08:42 PM Aug 2020

Trump is opening Alaska's wilderness to the oil business, but no one is buying

The Trump administration announced this week it would issue decades-long leases in the massive Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), potentially holding its first auctions by the end of the year.

It’s not clear anyone will take them up on the offer.

For quite some time, oil and gas companies (and their financers) have been running in the other direction. Major banks have already refused to lend to projects that would drill in the 19.6-million-acre Alaskan preserve known as the “last great wilderness.” Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo had all sworn off financing oil development in the tundra’s refuge.

And few oil firms appear ready to take out loans, in any case. Last year, BP sold off its Alaska operations (including leasing rights in a private inholding of ANWR). Anadarko, Pioneer Natural Resources, and Marathon Oil have hocked their holdings. Shell left Alaska without bothering to sell its assets. That’s left two companies, ConocoPhillips and Hilcorp, controlling 72% of Alaska’s oil production (the rest are owned by ExxonMobil and a few smaller firms).

For all Donald Trump’s talk of “energy dominance,” the future of ANWR may be out of his hands. The hesitancy to drill new wells in Alaska’s Arctic is driven in part by a warming world: The state is heating up twice as fast as the rest of the nation, and its melting permafrost wreaks havoc on drilling infrastructure. But it has much more to do with the dire economics of drilling for expensive oil in remote locations.

https://qz.com/1893048/why-most-oil-companies-wont-drill-in-alaskas-arctic-refuge/?utm_source=YPL

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump is opening Alaska's wilderness to the oil business, but no one is buying (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2020 OP
Not necessary, not good optics. OAITW r.2.0 Aug 2020 #1
Bankers are not always fools Chainfire Aug 2020 #2

OAITW r.2.0

(24,562 posts)
1. Not necessary, not good optics.
Thu Aug 20, 2020, 08:45 PM
Aug 2020

Trump is 10 years too late on this fiasco. Probably thought that he'd be seeing yuge graft opportunity on this.

Chainfire

(17,612 posts)
2. Bankers are not always fools
Thu Aug 20, 2020, 09:32 PM
Aug 2020

who wants to stick their necks out on a project that will probably be killed on Jan. 21?

Maybe I will bid on a track. I have never seen a piece of pristine wilderness I would not want to fuck up. You reckon $500.00 would buy a few hundred acres of oil rights.

(ok, people, it is sarcasm)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Trump is opening Alaska's...