Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Thu May 27, 2021, 08:30 PM May 2021

Oh, Yay. New Russian Arctic Oil Port Will Ship 25 Million Tons in 2024, 100 Million Tons By 2030

There is still a thick layer of sea-ice in the Yenisey Bay. But ships have still made their way to the coast of the Taymyr Peninsula and set ashore about 20,000 tons of construction materials. The shipments to the remote location mark the start of construction of what ultimately will become Russia’s biggest oil terminal in the Arctic. Included in the materials are heavy machinery, housing modules, communication equipment and other goods needed for the building of a project working village.

EDIT

According to Rosneft, Sever Bay terminal has been fully approved by the authorities, and engineers will soon start hydrotechnical works in the nearby waters and construction of port installations on the shore. The terminal is a key component in Vostok Oil, the huge project that already by year 2024 is to deliver 25 million tons of oil. By 2030, the volumes will increase to 100 million tons per year. It is to be exported both westwards to European markets and eastwards to the Asia-Pacific region.

Rosneft is in the process of building the first ten ice-class tankers that is to shuttle to the Sever Bay terminal. The ships are built at the company’s own Zvezda Yard in Vladivostok.

The oil company argues that the Vostok Oil is “environmentally friendly,” and that it has “a very small hydrocarbon footprint”. Furthermore, the oil installations will reportedly be powered by wind turbines and associated gas.

Ed. - OFFS

EDIT

https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/2021/05/here-comes-russias-biggest-arctic-oil-terminal

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
3. Yeah, because billions of people would die if we did that and economic growth would go negative
Thu May 27, 2021, 09:00 PM
May 2021

Which, in turn, would help with a LOT of problems.

At least, ecological ones.

Scrivener7

(50,954 posts)
4. How do you figure? I am suggesting, of course, that we ramp up our use of other energy
Thu May 27, 2021, 09:04 PM
May 2021

sources to gradually replace oil. Which appears to be what is happening.

How will that kill billions of people?

 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
6. I just read what you wrote and responded literally :)
Thu May 27, 2021, 09:55 PM
May 2021

I do, however, have serious doubts about the possibility of drastically curtailing use of fossil fuels without a corresponding drastic reduction in both worldwide birth rate (at minimum) and at least a decent-sized economic contraction.

Endless economic growth is not possible without the relatively 'free' (high EROEI) energy of fossil fuels. Not without some tech miracle.

 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
2. The actual extraction of the oil may be relatively environmentally friendly
Thu May 27, 2021, 08:58 PM
May 2021

I mean, in relation to other installations. I don't know either way, but that COULD be true.

The BURNING of the oil, the release of the sequestered carbon, however ... cannot be environmentally friendly, period.

It's a bit like Perdue Pharma bragging that their Oxycontin contains no artificial flavors or colors.

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
5. Yeah, the Russians are famous for their fastidious care for the land on which they drill . . .
Thu May 27, 2021, 09:16 PM
May 2021

Russian authorities said the fuel spill at an Arctic power station earlier in 2020 was the largest in world history, a top emergencies official said Thursday. Some 21,000 tons of oil poured into the surrounding ground and waterways near the city of Norilsk after a diesel oil tank belonging to a subsidiary of Russian metals giant Nornickel collapsed on May 29.

“Such an amount of liquid diesel fuel has never been spilled in the history of mankind,” the state-run RIA Novosti news agency quoted Deputy Emergency Minister Alexander Chupriyan as telling reporters. “We already trapped [the fuel] in the Arctic zone,” he said.

A team of Nornickel-funded scientists, meanwhile, struck a more optimistic tone with their discovery of the five polluted rivers’ self-cleaning abilities, according to their final report cited by the state-run TASS news agency Wednesday. “The microflora in the studied waters has adapted to oil products and is able to participate in their decomposition,” said members of the so-called Great Norilsk Expedition organized by the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences in August.

Nornickel is currently contesting a $2 billion damages claim with Russia’s state environmental watchdog.

EDIT

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/12/24/russia-admits-to-worlds-largest-arctic-oil-spill-a72477


Men cleaning an oil spill from a river near the Komi Republic town of Usinsk in Russia's far north

On an August morning in 1994, Ekaterina Dyachkova took her usual walk down to the Pechora River in her village of Novikbozh in Russia's far north. As she approached, a strange smell stung her nose, and when she reached the water, she realized it was black. Boats and their oars were covered in oil. "Our fishermen were coming back with sticky black nets," Dyachkova, a 62-year-old biology teacher and school director, told DW. "It smelled like a gas station."

The oil spill, which had occurred at nearby drilling sites in the Komi Republic town of Usinsk, went down in history as one of the biggest ever on land. Later, research revealed that multiple breaches in old Soviet pipelines had been leaking for eight months, with the fact being hidden from the public for as long as possible. When an oil slick 15 centimeters (6 inches) deep reached the river, however, the disaster was all too evident.


The 1994 oil spill in Russia's far north went down in history as one of the biggest ever on land



EDIT

Russia's pipeline system is one of the longest in the world and was largely developed in the Soviet era. Oil pipelines alone stretch for 53,000 kilometers (32,933 miles) — more than once around the whole Earth. However, more than half of all oil pipelines in the country are worn from age, which is causing most of the leaks, says Russia's Natural Resources and Environment Ministry. Oil workers from companies operating in Russia's far north confirmed in anonymous interviews with DW that the infrastructure at some oil wells is inadequate.

Regular check-ups and replacement of pipes are costly for companies and often aren't done thoroughly. Greenpeace Russia estimates that the country's oil companies save around $3 billion (€2.5 billion) annually by not investing in new infrastructure. This, according to Greenpeace, helps to keep production costs lower and makes the industry more profitable for investors.

EDIT

https://www.dw.com/en/russia-oil-spills-far-north/a-56916148

 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
7. I wasn't saying I'd bet on it or anything
Thu May 27, 2021, 10:09 PM
May 2021

Just that it's possible

Main point was regardless of the production being relatively clean, the burning of it is a disaster period.

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
8. Well, yeah . . . .
Thu May 27, 2021, 10:29 PM
May 2021
Theoretically.

Oh, but they're going to stick a couple of windmills next to the oil terminal!!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Oh, Yay. New Russian Arc...