If Australians Believe Their Insurance Will Cover Broad Climate Disasters, They Should Think Again
No matter how much you pay for your home or car insurance, if your property is damaged by mouse plague, nuclear radiation, war or rising sea levels you are almost certainly on your own. If youre lucky, your insurance might cover you against storms but maybe not against floods (you know the difference, right?). Likewise, your insurance almost certainly doesnt cover you against storm surges or a dam bursting.
Australians spend more than $10bn for non-life insurance products each year, even though theres only a one in 500 chance your house will catch fire. Thats why theres so much profit to be made in insurance. If a forecaster says somethings likely to happen, then its highly unlikely youll be able to get insurance against it. Insurance is like a lottery in reverse; lots of people lose a little bit of money paying for premiums they dont claim against, a few people get a fair bit of money, and the insurer makes a lot of money for handing one group of peoples money to the other. As with gambling, the house always wins. Which brings me back to mice, nuclear power stations and climate change.
There is a plague of mice rampaging from Queensland through northern New South Wales. Some farmers and small business owners have lost their entire income. So far the cost is estimated to be about $1bn but unless the mice eat through your wiring and burn your house down, insurance almost certainly wont cover any losses. While insurance companies make their profit out of our fear of an individual catastrophe, they would lose their entire business if they insured against society-wide catastrophe. We take it for granted that insurance companies will pay out if an accident hits our car or house but most people rarely think about what will happen if catastrophe hits us all at once. Which is why the small print on insurance premiums is so small.
EDIT
While you can still get cyclone insurance in northern Australia, the prices are rising rapidly as global temperatures rise and tropical cyclone intensity increases. In response, the Morrison government announced a $10bn reinsurance pool to help lower insurance premiums for northern Australians. But not even the insurance industry thinks that will work. According to the chief executive of Suncorp, Steve Johnston, disaster mitigation, rather than disaster clean-up, is where Australia should focus. It is a sad fact that 97 cents of every dollar of disaster funding goes to recovery and rebuild. The remaining 3 cents spent on preparation and mitigation is but a small drop in a rapidly filling bucket.
EDIT
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jun/09/mice-floods-and-the-climate-crisis-why-your-insurance-wont-cover-society-wide-catastrophes