Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumDenial Is Gone; Greenwashing Ineffective, So GQP Will Blame China To Avoid Any Real Climate Action
EDIT
Its a debate echoed in the Senate by former climate skeptic Sen. John Barrasso, a Republican from the uranium-rich petrostate of Wyoming. Hes switched from outright denial to tactical retreat and obfuscation. While now admitting the climate crisis is a thing, hes also said reducing the use of fossil fuels will not solve climate change, an idea that common sense and expert opinion resoundingly rejects. In a USA Today op-ed, Barrasso touted his role in a historic, bipartisan environmental innovation law, referring to an agreement tucked into an energy bill that reduced hydrofluorocarbons emissions. But he also claimed President Bidens executive orders to rejoin the Paris accord, nix the Keystone XL pipeline and freeze new oil, gas and coal leases on federal lands took a sledgehammer to the economies of Western states without putting a dent in climate change.
Then he revealed the core of the emerging debate and delay strategy with this key juxtaposition: "Damaging Americas economy wont stop climate change. Between 2015 and 2019, carbon dioxide emissions jumped in Russia, China and India. At the same time, U.S. emissions continued to drop, as they have since 2007." And there it is. For Republicans ranging from supposed converts like Barrasso to meme-wielding conspiracy peddlers like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia), China is the excuse to do little or nothing.
To wit, the mission statement for the aforementioned Conservative Climate Caucus bluntly asserts that China is the greatest immediate obstacle to reducing world emissions. And when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changes (IPCC) dire Sixth Assessment hit the news cycle in August, Conservative Climate Caucus ranking member Garret Graves (R-Louisiana) admitted it highlights the urgency of climate change, but said, we must ensure we approach this issue the right way. The right way for Graves means avoid[ing] policies that rely on higher taxes, increased regulations, and ensure us being under the thumb of China. More specifically, conservatives often emphasize, the U.S. must avoid being under the thumb of Communist China. They stress the Communist part (a label still ironically pasted on the face of a country so steeped in neoliberal capitalism), perhaps because its only a short rhetorical leap from Beijings Reds to the socialist Green New Deal here at home? More directly, they deem it unfair to demand unilateral action by freedom-loving Americans while Communist China gets away with runaway carbon emissions.
Of course, its true that China accounts for more than half the worlds coal power and is the worlds largest carbon-dioxide emitter. Its also true that U.S. CO2 emissions have declined over the years, while Chinas are now nearly twice the U.S.s. And its also true that, as David Holt, president of the fossil-fueled Consumer Energy Alliance recently wrote, China is home to 23 of the top 25 cities responsible for 52 percent of the planets urban greenhouse gas emissions. But that fact doesnt magically vacate the U.S.s responsibility for its own emissions. Nor does it obviate the fact that, as Mongabay pointed out, historically, the U.S. is responsible for a quarter of the worlds greenhouse gas output. Thats despite being home to less than 5 percent of the worlds population. In fact, the study Holt cited on emissions in China also noted that Chinas per capita output is still below wealthier countries like the U.S. and those in Europe. But for conservative climate converts looking for a way to block real regulatory efforts, the question of Why should we pay the price economically while China gets away scot-free? is the ultimate Trump card (pun intended).
EDIT
https://truthout.org/articles/chinas-emissions-are-made-in-america/