Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 08:53 AM Nov 2021

Brilliant! John Curtis (R-UT): "Work With Us On Natural Gas And We'll Work With You On Methane"

EDIT

What are some things that you do feel that there can be bipartisan support on?

Curtis: It’s important that Republicans turn a page. We’ve done a fabulous job of telling people what we don’t like. It is important that we tell them what we like. One thing we would ask of [our Democratic colleagues] is a better articulation of the overall goal of reducing worldwide greenhouse gas emissions and what that looks like. We’d like to have some really thoughtful discussions with our Democratic colleagues about nuclear. And I think it’s fair to say that there are some concerns with nuclear—I share some of those concerns—but I’m going to bet we can innovate past those concerns, such as what to do with spent fuel rods and safety.

Another one where there’s broad bipartisan support is hydrogen, a potential game changer for a worldwide solution that could become a low-cost alternative to China and to Russia.

One where we probably have some disagreement—but it’s important to us—that’s the actual use of fossil fuels, particularly natural gas that has helped the U.S. reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In Russia, in India—natural gas could be the low-cost leader immediately and cause them to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. I’m willing to join my Democratic colleagues in their calls for more control on methane. That’s one where we’d say, “Hey, work with us on natural gas, and we’ll work with you on methane.”

EDIT

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/29102021/john-curtis-conservative-climate-caucus-glasgow-cop26/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brilliant! John Curtis (R-UT): "Work With Us On Natural Gas And We'll Work With You On Methane" (Original Post) hatrack Nov 2021 OP
oh good grief lapfog_1 Nov 2021 #1
Natural gas is a fossil fuel and it's extraction and use pollute. Magoo48 Nov 2021 #2
Natural gas is a greenhouse gas. Mickju Nov 2021 #3

lapfog_1

(29,205 posts)
1. oh good grief
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 09:22 AM
Nov 2021

Hydrogen is NOT a fuel source.

It is a possible energy transport and storage mechanism. That's all.

It is like a battery.

It takes energy to make hydrogen, and then you can get energy back out of hydrogen through some chemical process or other ( fuel cells, ICE, etc).

To date, the transportation industry has not gained wide acceptance of the use of hydrogen as a "battery" for vehicles mostly because it is very hard to contain long term (read papers on hydrogen embrittlement in various metals).

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Brilliant! John Curtis (...