Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumNo Way! Economists (Brace Yourselves!) Understimated Economic Impacts Of Rapid Global Warming
EDIT
Dr. Nordhaus became a leading voice for a nationwide carbon tax that would discourage the use of fossil fuels and propel a transition toward more sustainable forms of energy. It remained the preferred choice of economists and business interests for decades. And in 2018, Dr. Nordhaus was honored with the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. But as President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act with its $392 billion in climate-related subsidies, one thing became very clear: The nations biggest initiative to address climate change is built on a different foundation from the one Dr. Nordhaus proposed.
EDIT
At the same time, Dr. Nordhauss model was drawing criticism for underestimating the havoc that climate change would wreak. Like other models, it has been revised several times, but it still relies on broad assumptions and places less value on harm to future generations than it places on harm to those today. It also doesnt fully incorporate the risk of less likely but substantially worse trajectories of warming. Dr. Nordhaus dismissed the criticisms. They are all subjective and based on selective interpretation of science and economics, he wrote in an email. Some people hold these views, as would be expected in any controversial subject, but many others do not.
Heather Boushey, a member of the White Houses Council of Economic Advisers who handles climate issues, says the field is learning that simply tinkering with prices wont be enough as the climate nears catastrophic tipping points, like the evaporation of rivers, choking off whole regions and setting off a cascade of economic effects. So much of economics is about marginal changes, Dr. Boushey said. With climate, that no longer makes sense, because you have these systemic risks. She sees her current assignment as similar to her previous work, running a think tank focused on inequality: It profoundly alters the way people think about economics.
To many economists, the approach pioneered by Dr. Nordhaus was increasingly out of step with the urgency that climate scientists were trying to communicate to policymakers. But a carbon tax remained at the center of a bipartisan effort on climate change, supported by a panoply of large corporations and more than 3,600 economists, that also called for removing cumbersome regulations. In his Nobel speech in 2018, Dr. Nordhaus pegged the optimal carbon price that is, the shared economic burden caused by each ton of emissions at $43 in 2020. Gernot Wagner, a climate economist at Columbia Business School, called it a woeful underestimate of the true cost noting that the prize committees home country already taxed carbon at $120 per ton.
EDIT
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/25/business/economy/economy-climate-change.html
Voltaire2
(13,213 posts)it seems to me we have crossed some sort of dynamic barrier in the global climate system, and the slow shit hitting the fan crisis has sped up drastically.