Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We now have to feed starving bees. What we have done to the ecosystem!!! (Original Post) applegrove 9 hrs ago OP
Kick SheltieLover 9 hrs ago #1
25 years ago Cirsium 8 hrs ago #2
I helped with an art display years ago for a town store front contest. littlemissmartypants 6 hrs ago #3

Cirsium

(3,938 posts)
2. 25 years ago
Sat Mar 28, 2026, 06:56 PM
8 hrs ago

About 25 years ago in the orchard, I noticed two things. Warm spells in midwinter would bring the bees out, and there was nothing for them. And year by year, there were fewer native plants in bloom around the orchards to serve as a supplemental food source. Weaker bees are more susceptible to disease.

The Washington State University study isn’t saying that we suddenly have to feed bees because nature has failed. Beekeepers have been supplement-feeding bees for a long time — that’s not new. What the study shows is that a better, more complete feed improves colony health, with more bees and brood and significantly lower winter losses. In other words, it’s an improvement to an existing management practice, not the discovery of a new emergency.

European honeybees, an introduced species in North America that can place stresses on local ecosystems, are already managed like livestock, especially in large-scale agriculture. Supplemental feeding isn’t new — this is just a better version of it.

It probably says as much about how we farm as it does about the bees.

The claim is often made that our food supply depends on European honeybees. That’s an overstatement. They’re important for some crops, but far from the whole picture. No crops depend exclusively on European honeybees. Some business models do — especially in large-scale monoculture systems.

Grain crops are wind-pollinated. Many others — tomatoes, melons, squash — are pollinated by native bees, especially bumblebees. Even in crops often associated with European honeybees for maximum yield per acre, pollination is not exclusive. Native pollinators play a critical role there as well, particularly in tree fruits and nuts. Bumblebees alone pollinate more than 25 important crops — cranberries, blueberries, strawberries, plums, zucchini, melons, sweet peppers, tomatoes — along with seed crops like alfalfa, red clover, cotton, and sunflower.

The decline of native pollinators in North America is probably a far greater concern than the condition of European honeybees.

littlemissmartypants

(33,458 posts)
3. I helped with an art display years ago for a town store front contest.
Sat Mar 28, 2026, 09:38 PM
6 hrs ago

The theme was bees and blueberries. The team did some research and found out, according to someone, supposedly the more times that a pollinator visits a bloom the sweeter the fruit becomes. I believe it. I wish I had the reference for that study now.

Birds are responsible for pollination, too. We're losing them at alarming rates worldwide.

Frankly, I'm concerned about the natural world writ large.

❤️

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»We now have to feed starv...