Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumNature - Shifting Away From Meat Would Substantially Improve Climate; Meanwhile, Americans Eating More Meat Than Ever
A global shift to mostly plant-based diets with minimal processed foods and red meat, coupled with a large decrease in food waste, would decrease greenhouse gas emissions by more than 85% by 2050 compared to 2020 agricultural emissions, according to a new study. The study, published Wednesday in Nature, calculated the economic and environmental impacts of people across the world adopting a diet that mostly consists of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, nuts and legumes, with a massive decrease in red meat, ultra-processed foods, dairy and added sugars, along with a halving of global food waste. They found that such changes would slash greenhouse gas emissions and spur an estimated 6% decrease in farmland and a 17% decrease in farm production over the next 25 years when compared to the current trajectory.
EDIT
The study comes as people in the US are eating more meat than ever. An annual Food Industry Association survey released in March showed that the vast majority of Americans view meat as part of a healthy diet and that meat sales hit a record high in 2025, reaching $112 billion.
Meat featured prominently in the new US dietary guidelines released in January that emphasized protein from animal products. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said the guidelines would revolutionize the nations food culture. Meat eating has been central to the Make America Healthy Again, or MAHA, movement a slogan and coalition promoted and kickstarted by Kennedy, a carnivore diet adherent himself.
Americans also get a large percentage of calories from ultra-processed foods. Last year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a study examining food consumption from 2021-2023 and found that about 55% of total calories consumed by Americans came from ultra-processed foods. For children, it was nearly 62%.
EDIT
https://www.thenewlede.org/2026/07/planetary-health-diet-greenhouse-gases/
JBTaurus83
(1,915 posts)I have incorporated far more vegetarian meals. I dont eat meat for breakfasts anymore. Just made a hearty pot of vegetable soup with cabbage, beans, rice, tomatoes, carrots and peas. Its very easy to phase meat out of your diet at least twice per day.
waterwatcher123
(590 posts)Even if the critical environmental impacts are set aside, the food available in most grocery stores is really unfit for human consumption. Most packaged food is designed for shelf life and to hook people into eating more calories through the manipulation of salt, sugar and fat. A whole foods, plant based diet would improve public health considerally and reduce health care expenditures. The ground breaking work of Collin Campbell in the China Study demonstrates this concept conclusively while simultaneouly questioning the wisdom of the protein obsession. The Forks Over Knives documentary captures how a plant based whole foods diet can reverse serious medical conditions.
2naSalit
(105,430 posts)Just insane.
FalloutShelter
(14,811 posts)When I made the choice to become vegetarian, in the 70s, it was difficult to source items to cook in various international cuisines that are more Vege friendly. Today the choices are great and broadly available.
Ive become an accomplished Vege cook, and my friends and family are always happy for me to cook for them.
That being said
not dead yet, and I dont take ANY prescription drugs, have zero health issues and hike four miles three to five days a week weather permitting.I am not preaching, just wanted to make the point that a meat heavy diet is not the only way to be healthy.
At 72, I feel like I am my own case study.
Ritabert
(2,962 posts)...on I-5 near Coalinga. The stench was incredible and the cows looked stressed. That was that. I don't even miss meat.
flvegan
(66,793 posts)Such a stupid, selfish species.
OKIsItJustMe
(22,514 posts)Transforming global food systems would benefit health and the planet but farmers need support to adapt to fundamental changes
❝Rather than using these results as an excuse for inaction it's critical that governments rise to the challenge.❞
Dr Matt Gibson
Research Fellow, LSHTM
Following recommendations to shift to healthier diets, improve farm productivity and halve food waste, could reduce global agricultural land use by up to 6% by 2050 and lead to a 42% decline ($630 billion) in global livestock production value compared to 2020.
Implementing the changes by 2050 would also lead to an estimated 70% ($274bn) decrease in the production value of ruminant animals (beef cattle, sheep, and goats) and 400 million fewer ruminant animals globally compared to 2020. In contrast the global value of vegetable, fruit, nut and legume production would increase by 57% ($890bn).
The findings come from a new analysis published in Nature by researchers from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Cornell University, and 10 modelling teams that looked at the implications of implementing a 2025 EAT-Lancet Commission style food systems transformation.
The new analysis shows that following the 2025 EAT-Lancet Commission recommendations could also see agriculture related net-CO2 emissions from land-use change fall by 85% by 2050 compared to 2020 levels.