Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

OnlinePoker

(5,722 posts) Tue Sep 11, 2012, 12:48 PM Sep 2012

0

Did we hit the bottom on 6 September?

I know it's early to call it, but we've had two up days in a row from day 250 (6 Sep) when it was 2.29376 million sq km.

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/arctic.sea.ice.interactive.html

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did we hit the bottom on 6 September? (Original Post) OnlinePoker Sep 2012 OP

A couple other agencies have already called the minimum XemaSab Sep 2012 #1

maybe, but the ice is so rotten that I think it's too early to tell phantom power Sep 2012 #2

possibly the bottom for area, ... CRH Sep 2012 #3

Volume is monthly XemaSab Sep 2012 #4

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)

1. A couple other agencies have already called the minimum

Reply to OnlinePoker (Original post)

Tue Sep 11, 2012, 12:50 PM

Sep 2012

The fun of CT is that the ice can be redistributed, so we could have the same number with a much smaller extent.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)

2. maybe, but the ice is so rotten that I think it's too early to tell

Reply to OnlinePoker (Original post)

Tue Sep 11, 2012, 12:56 PM

Sep 2012

CRH

(1,553 posts)

3. possibly the bottom for area, ...

Reply to OnlinePoker (Original post)

Tue Sep 11, 2012, 01:01 PM

Sep 2012

Is there similar charting for daily volume, km3?

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)

4. Volume is monthly

Reply to CRH (Reply #3)

Tue Sep 11, 2012, 01:46 PM

Sep 2012

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Did we hit the bottom on ...