Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Sat Oct 20, 2012, 11:54 AM Oct 2012

Oz Broadcast Regulator Requires Denialist Shock Jock To Undergo Reality Training

EDIT

The debate about climate change is dogged – possibly even defined – by its interminable, intractable tug of war over the "facts". A hand grenade is lobbed into no-man's land triggering a volley of return fire. But, when the dust settles, can anyone truly claim to have advanced their position?

Of course, the art of "manufacturing doubt" has long been in the playbook of those hoping or needing to divert attention away from evidence. We saw it a generation ago with smoking, just as we see it today with climate change. But knowing how this blatant tactic is deployed doesn't make it any easier to nullify or deter. Compounding the problem is the speed at which "facts" can now spread unchallenged across the internet. Rebutting or contextualising inaccuracies takes expertise and, above all, time and energy.

This week has witnessed two text-book examples of this phenomenon in action. First, we had an article in the Mail of Sunday with the arresting headline that "Global warming stopped 16 years ago". Predictably, it was picked up and repeated across the world by news outlets keen to push that line. A day or so later the rebuttals and clarifications from scientists started to land, but the meme had already gained purchase with those seeking such confirmation.

And then we heard the extraordinary news that Alan Jones, the Australian climate sceptic shock jock, had been ordered by the country's media regulator (full ruling here) to undertake "factual accuracy" training, and to employ fact-checkers, following one of his infamous near-daily rants about the climate "hoax".

EDIT

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2012/oct/19/climate-change-facts-journalism

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oz Broadcast Regulator Requires Denialist Shock Jock To Undergo Reality Training (Original Post) hatrack Oct 2012 OP
Good! Cheers to the Aussie government for teaching that idiot a lesson. AverageJoe90 Oct 2012 #1
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
1. Good! Cheers to the Aussie government for teaching that idiot a lesson.
Sun Oct 21, 2012, 12:36 AM
Oct 2012

Now, if only we could get the U.S. government to do the same, not just for those idiot deniers, and so-called anti-AGW 'skeptics', like Monckton, Christy, Booker(the "we can't stop Co2 from doubling!" fellow). et al.; but also for those very few fringe "climate apocalypse" people, as well(yes, mainly the "humanity is going (inevitably) to die out", "we can't stop global warming" and "Earth WILL turn into Venus" set.). That would really help us, I think. Fact checkers? I'm thinking they could hire people like Peter Sinclair(our very own greenman3610!), Katherine Hayhoe, and the Skeptical Science guys for starters; they're all really good, IMHO.



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Oz Broadcast Regulator Re...