Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 01:24 PM Jan 2013

Total Ends New Investment In New US Dry Shale Gas Plays - Upstream Online

EDIT

The French giant shelled out $2.25 billion for a 25% slice of Chesapeake Energy's Barnett Shale assets in January 2010.

"Our investment in Texas shows a serious loss which, of course, does not question Total's results or development," he said. The Total chief said the company had invested in Texas on the basis of gas at more than $6 per British thermal unit, but that "today we are at $3.2 (per btu). It does not work".

"It is clear that we [should] soft-pedal. I see no point in investing ... where there is no profitability," de Margerie said of the dry shale gas market. “The fields are still there, the permits are still valid and production will restart when gas prices return to above cost levels,” he added.

The situation in the Utica area was different because it was based on more profitable gas rich with condensates, he said.

EDIT

http://www.upstreamonline.com/live/article1313649.ece

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Total Ends New Investment In New US Dry Shale Gas Plays - Upstream Online (Original Post) hatrack Jan 2013 OP
As was expected. Arctic Dave Jan 2013 #1
 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
1. As was expected.
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 01:44 PM
Jan 2013

Producing O&G in this manner was a house of cards.

Without inflated prices none of it is worth the cost of extracting.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Total Ends New Investment...