Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumHumans have already set in motion 69 feet of sea-level rise
from Grist:
31 Jan 2013 8:07 AM
Humans have already set in motion 69 feet of sea-level rise
By Chris Mooney
Last week, a much discussed new paper in the journal Nature seemed to suggest to some that we neednt worry too much about the melting of Greenland, the mile-thick mass of ice at the top of the globe. The research found that the Greenland ice sheet seems to have survived a previous warm period in Earths history the Eemian period, some 126,000 years ago without vanishing (although it did melt considerably).
But Ohio State glaciologist Jason Box isnt buying it.
At Mondays Climate Desk Live briefing in Washington, D.C., Box, who has visited Greenland 23 times to track its changing climate, explained that weve already pushed atmospheric carbon dioxide 40 percent beyond Eemian levels. Whats more, levels of atmospheric methane are a dramatic 240 percent higher both with no signs of stopping. There is no analogue for that in the ice record, said Box.
And thats not all. The present mass-scale human burning of trees and vegetation for clearing land and building fires, plus our pumping of aerosols into the atmosphere from human pollution, werent happening during the Eemian. These human activities are darkening Greenlands icy surface, and weakening its ability to bounce incoming sunlight back away from the planet. Instead, more light is absorbed, leading to more melting, in a classic feedback process that is hard to slow down. ..................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://grist.org/climate-energy/humans-have-already-set-in-motion-69-feet-of-sea-level-rise/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 2171 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Humans have already set in motion 69 feet of sea-level rise (Original Post)
marmar
Jan 2013
OP
It's the figure for both Greenland and Antarctic melting he thinks is already inevitable
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2013
#7
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)1. :( nt
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)2. There are no surprises here...
For the Doomitarians in the crowd, anyway...
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)3. 69 feet is hard to believe
NOTE: I am not a climate change denier. If that's the scientific concensus then I believe it.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)7. It's the figure for both Greenland and Antarctic melting he thinks is already inevitable
Total potential rise:
Ice sheets contain enormous quantities of frozen water. If the Greenland Ice Sheet melted, scientists estimate that sea level would rise about 6 meters (20 feet). If the Antarctic Ice Sheet melted, sea level would rise by about 60 meters (200 feet).
http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/quickfacts/icesheets.html
http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/quickfacts/icesheets.html
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)8. Thanks!
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)5. Slip Slidin' Away - Ice sheets and sea level in a warming world
Lecture by Richard Alley, Evan Pugh Professor of Geoscience at Pennsylvania State University, 10/23/2012 at Stanford University, sponsored by the Stanford School of Earth Sciences
Richard Alley has the sort of voice and delivery that will either captivate you or annoy you no end, but his grasp of the science is pretty obvious. He dismisses the danger from Greenland (though not the scientific potential), but I think Antarctica gives him bad dreams.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)6. scary, nt
xchrom
(108,903 posts)10. du rec. nt