Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumEnvironmentalists Celebrate Nuclear Plant Closing
Environmentalists Celebrate Nuclear Plant Closing
By GILLIAN FLACCUS and AMY TAXIN Associated Press
SAN CLEMENTE, Calif. June 8, 2013 (AP)
Environmentalists and nearby residents are hailing a decision by Southern California Edison to permanently shut down its troubled San Onofre nuclear power plant.
Two dozen community members hugged and wiped away tears on Friday as they gathered outside the front gates of the seaside plant for an impromptu celebration.
Longtime plant opponent Gary Headricks says his joy at the plant's closing is similar to the happiness he felt when his children were born.
Business groups say the closure will hurt the Southern California economy as companies and households face the prospect of power shortages.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/environmentalists-celebrate-nuclear-plant-closing-19351157#.UbJUY-oo7_R
(Short article, no more at link.)
lob1
(3,820 posts)It's a good day for California.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)News release, no copyright issues:
Posted May. 29, 2013 / Posted by: Adam Russell
Friends of the Earth: More proof utility sought to mislead NRC
WASHINGTON, D.C. Under pressure from the California Public Utility Commission, Southern California Edison has released to Friends of the Earth another suppressed and highly incriminating internal document, showing that the utility knew eight years ago of serious flaws in the design of replacement steam generators for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. The letter directly contradicts written testimony Edison gave in January to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
The 2005 letter from then-Edison Vice President Dwight Nunn was released Tuesday, after the state PUC sharply questioned why Edison had not provided it as part of the PUCs investigation of failure of the San Onofre reactors, shut down since January 2012 after a leak of radioactive steam. The day before, Boxer released a 2004 letter from Nunn proving that Edison knew that the flawed generators were not like-for-like with the ones they replaced, but failed to reveal that to the NRC in order to expedite approval from the NRC.
This new letter shows conclusively that in 2005 Edison was aware that its defective design could lead to vibration and cracking of steam generator tubes, said Damon Moglen, Friends of the Earths climate and energy program director. While Edison knew this could lead to what the earlier letter calls a disastrous outcome, they didnt fix the problem, they didnt tell the NRC then and denied it again in testimony this year. This is a scandal of the highest order: Edison prioritized its construction schedule and profits and endangered the lives and livelihoods of millions of Southern Californians.
In the June 16, 2005 letter, Nunn writes to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which manufactured the replacement steam generators to Edisons specifications, about the probability that the design could cause the tubes to vibrate and crack. Despite later suggestions from a joint Mitsubishi/Edison design team to fix the problem prior to construction, the contractors rejected such changes because they would have triggered a lengthy NRC license amendment review, including public hearings. In January, in written testimony to the NRC in a case brought by Friends of the Earth, Edison claimed that the problem was not known at the time.
S. David Freeman, former head of the Tennessee Valley Authority and of several nuclear utilities, said Edison knew it was taking a risk.
With these revelations, its clear that Edison was conducting an experiment all along, said Freeman, senior advisor to Friends of the Earth. They were operating reactors with equipment that they knew had major problems. Thats unforgivable.
Edison gambled that additional safety measures were not needed when they gave the highest priority not to safety but speed of construction. Of course they didn't know for sure that the equipment would fail, but they did know that they were taking a risk and they lost on their gamble. Gambling with the safety of a nuclear plant is not acceptable and an egregious misuse of ratepayers money.
The mounting revelations of Edisons deception dash the utilitys request to restart San Onofre rector Unit 2 this summer, said Moglen. The NRC must make sure these reactors are not restarted with this damaged equipment, and the PUC must make sure no ratepayer money is spent to operate, let alone restart, this failed plant, he said.
After Senator Boxer released the 2004 letter yesterday, the California PUC issued a statement asking whether Edison had a duty to disclose the letters earlier. PUC Executive Director Paul Clanon said the Commission need(s) to investigate whether Edison took unnecessary risks, or tried to evade regulatory oversight. Edison quickly released the 2005 letter, along with other suppressed internal documents (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) that may hold more revelations. Friends of the Earth is currently evaluating the remaining documents.
http://www.foe.org/news/news-releases/2013-05-pressed-by-calif-regulators-edison-releases-letter
Ben Bergman | May 28th, 2013, 5:46pm
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-California) is asking the Justice Department to investigate whether Southern California Edison (SCE) lied to regulators and the public about the San Onofre nuclear plant.
In a conference call with reporters on Tuesday, Senator Boxer did not hide her contempt towards Edison.
What theyre saying is gobbledygook, she said. Its embarrassing.
The senator later added: I dont know what planet theyre living on, she added....
http://www.scpr.org/news/2013/05/28/37459/boxer-says-edison-lied-wants-justice-department-to/
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)or "Environmentalists Celebrate 5 Million Extra Tons of Atmospheric Carbon - Every Year"?
These people not only represent the antithesis of environmentalism, they're just fucking stupid.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)To you it is nothing more than a cloak you wrap yourself in to try and sell the nuclear industry to those who don't know better.
If you actually cared about the goals you pretend to embrace you wouldn't constantly be trying to undermine renewable energy.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Taking the time to write those dreadful clauses
sad
bananas
(27,509 posts)And it makes it easy to tell who are environmentalists and who are nuclear shills.