Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pscot

(21,024 posts)
Sat Aug 3, 2013, 08:58 PM Aug 2013

Lummis say no coal port here

The Tribe has a lot of leverage. They're rich and they have good lawyers. Good slide show at the link

http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2013/08/02/lummi-indians-to-feds-no-coal-port-here/

The Lummi Indian Nation has formally informed the federal government of its “unconditional and unequivocal opposition” to the proposed Gateway Pacific coal export terminal, which would be located at Cherry Point in Whatcom County, just north of the Lummi Reservation.

Opposition from the Lummis, in a letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, puts significant new issues on the table for a lightning rod project. Gateway Pacific faces opposition from Puget Sound mayors (including Mike McGinn), King County Executive Dow Constantine, state legislators, environmental and climate groups and other Indian tribes.

The coal port needs permits from the Corps of Engineers to proceed. In his letter, tribal business council chair Tim Ballew stated:

“Review of the known facts, data, site plans and the development and operational goals of the projects have resulted in a clear and convincing conclusion that the proposed projects, if built and operated, would have a substantial impairment on the Lummi treaty fishing right harvest at XweChiexen (Cherry Point) and thoughout the Lummi ‘usual and accustomed’ fishing areas

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lummis say no coal port here (Original Post) pscot Aug 2013 OP
Good for them for saying no to these these vile, hideous coal exports limpyhobbler Aug 2013 #1
The initial plan was for 6 coal ports pscot Aug 2013 #2

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
1. Good for them for saying no to these these vile, hideous coal exports
Sun Aug 4, 2013, 02:43 AM
Aug 2013

Hopefully we can raise the issue of coal exports as a big issue.

Similar to how awareness was raised about Keystone XL.



pscot

(21,024 posts)
2. The initial plan was for 6 coal ports
Sun Aug 4, 2013, 11:51 AM
Aug 2013

If the Tribe stops this one, I think there may be only 2 viable options left, one on the Columbia and one at Longview.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Lummis say no coal port h...