Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Thu Aug 8, 2013, 04:23 PM Aug 2013

A Material That Could Make Solar Power “Dirt Cheap”

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/517811/a-material-that-could-make-solar-power-dirt-cheap/
[font face=Serif][font size=5]A Material That Could Make Solar Power “Dirt Cheap”[/font]
[font size=4] Researchers discover that a material known for a hundred years could lower the cost of solar power.[/font]

By Kevin Bullis on August 8, 2013

[font size=3]A new type of solar cell, made from a material that is dramatically cheaper to obtain and use than silicon, could generate as much power as today’s commodity solar cells.



Researchers developing the technology say that it could lead to solar panels that cost just 10 to 20 cents per watt. Solar panels now typically cost about 75 cents a watt, and the U.S. Department of Energy says 50 cents per watt will allow solar power to compete with fossil fuel.



Perovskites have been known for over a century, but no one thought to try them in solar cells until relatively recently. The particular material the researchers are using is very good at absorbing light. While conventional silicon solar panels use materials that are about 180 micrometers thick, the new solar cells use less than one micrometer of material to capture the same amount of sunlight. The pigment is a semiconductor that is also good at transporting the electric charge created when light hits it.

“The material is dirt cheap,” says Michael Grätzel, who is famous within the solar industry for inventing a type of solar cell that bears his name. His group has produced the most efficient perovskite solar cells so far—they convert 15 percent of the energy in sunlight into electricity, far more than other cheap-to-make solar cells. Based on its performance so far, and on its known light-conversion properties, researchers say its efficiency could easily rise as high as 20 to 25 percent, which is as good as the record efficiencies (typically achieved in labs) of the most common types of solar cells today. The efficiencies of mass-produced solar cells may be lower. But it makes sense to compare the lab efficiencies of the perovskite cells with the lab records for other materials. Grätzel says that perovskite in solar cells will likely prove to be a “forgiving” material that retains high efficiencies in mass production, since the manufacturing processes are simple.

…[/font][/font]
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Material That Could Make Solar Power “Dirt Cheap” (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Aug 2013 OP
A perovskite structure is any material with the same type of crystal structure as ... Kolesar Aug 2013 #1
I was hoping it would be chitin.... Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #2
That's all we need, solar powered roaches Fumesucker Aug 2013 #3
Good point, solar panels that run from the light. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2013 #4
More on the company working to develop this Yo_Mama Aug 2013 #5

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
1. A perovskite structure is any material with the same type of crystal structure as ...
Thu Aug 8, 2013, 04:34 PM
Aug 2013

... calcium titanium oxide (CaTiO3), known as the perovskite structure, ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perovskite_(structure)

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
3. That's all we need, solar powered roaches
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 06:08 AM
Aug 2013

I can just imagine the little bodies out on the window ledge sunning themselves, recharging their batteries for yet another night of scurrying around your kitchen.


Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
5. More on the company working to develop this
Fri Aug 9, 2013, 02:43 PM
Aug 2013
http://www.oxfordpv.com/

They are actually citing 8% efficiency with a near term advance to 10% and a hoped-for advance to 14%. However these cells should be cheap to produce.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»A Material That Could Mak...