Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumA Material That Could Make Solar Power “Dirt Cheap”
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/517811/a-material-that-could-make-solar-power-dirt-cheap/[font face=Serif][font size=5]A Material That Could Make Solar Power Dirt Cheap[/font]
[font size=4] Researchers discover that a material known for a hundred years could lower the cost of solar power.[/font]
By Kevin Bullis on August 8, 2013
[font size=3]A new type of solar cell, made from a material that is dramatically cheaper to obtain and use than silicon, could generate as much power as todays commodity solar cells.
Researchers developing the technology say that it could lead to solar panels that cost just 10 to 20 cents per watt. Solar panels now typically cost about 75 cents a watt, and the U.S. Department of Energy says 50 cents per watt will allow solar power to compete with fossil fuel.
Perovskites have been known for over a century, but no one thought to try them in solar cells until relatively recently. The particular material the researchers are using is very good at absorbing light. While conventional silicon solar panels use materials that are about 180 micrometers thick, the new solar cells use less than one micrometer of material to capture the same amount of sunlight. The pigment is a semiconductor that is also good at transporting the electric charge created when light hits it.
The material is dirt cheap, says Michael Grätzel, who is famous within the solar industry for inventing a type of solar cell that bears his name. His group has produced the most efficient perovskite solar cells so farthey convert 15 percent of the energy in sunlight into electricity, far more than other cheap-to-make solar cells. Based on its performance so far, and on its known light-conversion properties, researchers say its efficiency could easily rise as high as 20 to 25 percent, which is as good as the record efficiencies (typically achieved in labs) of the most common types of solar cells today. The efficiencies of mass-produced solar cells may be lower. But it makes sense to compare the lab efficiencies of the perovskite cells with the lab records for other materials. Grätzel says that perovskite in solar cells will likely prove to be a forgiving material that retains high efficiencies in mass production, since the manufacturing processes are simple.
[/font][/font]
[font size=4] Researchers discover that a material known for a hundred years could lower the cost of solar power.[/font]
By Kevin Bullis on August 8, 2013
[font size=3]A new type of solar cell, made from a material that is dramatically cheaper to obtain and use than silicon, could generate as much power as todays commodity solar cells.
Researchers developing the technology say that it could lead to solar panels that cost just 10 to 20 cents per watt. Solar panels now typically cost about 75 cents a watt, and the U.S. Department of Energy says 50 cents per watt will allow solar power to compete with fossil fuel.
Perovskites have been known for over a century, but no one thought to try them in solar cells until relatively recently. The particular material the researchers are using is very good at absorbing light. While conventional silicon solar panels use materials that are about 180 micrometers thick, the new solar cells use less than one micrometer of material to capture the same amount of sunlight. The pigment is a semiconductor that is also good at transporting the electric charge created when light hits it.
The material is dirt cheap, says Michael Grätzel, who is famous within the solar industry for inventing a type of solar cell that bears his name. His group has produced the most efficient perovskite solar cells so farthey convert 15 percent of the energy in sunlight into electricity, far more than other cheap-to-make solar cells. Based on its performance so far, and on its known light-conversion properties, researchers say its efficiency could easily rise as high as 20 to 25 percent, which is as good as the record efficiencies (typically achieved in labs) of the most common types of solar cells today. The efficiencies of mass-produced solar cells may be lower. But it makes sense to compare the lab efficiencies of the perovskite cells with the lab records for other materials. Grätzel says that perovskite in solar cells will likely prove to be a forgiving material that retains high efficiencies in mass production, since the manufacturing processes are simple.
[/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2375 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (23)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Material That Could Make Solar Power “Dirt Cheap” (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Aug 2013
OP
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)1. A perovskite structure is any material with the same type of crystal structure as ...
... calcium titanium oxide (CaTiO3), known as the perovskite structure, ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perovskite_(structure)
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)2. I was hoping it would be chitin....
New York is already a roach ranch.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)3. That's all we need, solar powered roaches
I can just imagine the little bodies out on the window ledge sunning themselves, recharging their batteries for yet another night of scurrying around your kitchen.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)4. Good point, solar panels that run from the light.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)5. More on the company working to develop this
http://www.oxfordpv.com/
They are actually citing 8% efficiency with a near term advance to 10% and a hoped-for advance to 14%. However these cells should be cheap to produce.
They are actually citing 8% efficiency with a near term advance to 10% and a hoped-for advance to 14%. However these cells should be cheap to produce.