Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumSeparating Fact from Fiction In Accounts of Germany’s Renewables Revolution
AUG 15, 2013
Amory B. Lovins
Chief Scientist
Separating Fact from Fiction In Accounts of Germanys Renewables Revolution
I recently wrote aboutand debunkedthe renewables disinformation campaign that spreads misinformed and falsely negative stories about the growth of renewable energy. A special focus of such disinformation has been reportage on Germanys efficiency-and-renewables revolution. The impressive success so far of the German Energiewende (energy turnaround) is an important existence proof for the world, because Germany is cloudy, high-latitude, heavily industrialized, highly competitive (it rivals Americas merchandise exports with one-fourth its population), and the worlds fourth-biggest economy.
Perhaps because German success would therefore belie the supposed necessity of fossil-fuel and nuclear energy, some media regularly report the Energiewendes failure or supposed impossibility. As I highlighted, Germanys renewables revolution is in fact highly successful and strong as ever, but that hasnt stopped three myths from gaining traction in the media: 1) Germanys supposed turn back to coal, 2) how renewables undermine grid reliability, and 3) how renewables subsidies are cratering the German economy. None of those are true, and heres why.
MYTH #1: GERMANYS TURN BACK TO COAL
An efficient new German coal plant begun in 2006, with fast ramp rates to complement variable renewables, was widely but wrongly heralded on its commissioning in 2012 (Europes only new coal plant that year) as signaling Germanys post-Fukushima turn back to coalnot mentioning that it replaced a larger amount of dirtier and far less efficient coal capacity that was shut down. Moreover, replacing old 35-to-38-percent-efficient coal units with modern 46-percent-efficient ones, like some of the 5.3 GW likely to come online this year, would save a fifth of their coal even if net capacity didnt change. And though capacity may fluctuate for a few years, the German Energy Agency expects 11.3 GW of coal capacity to be added and 18.5 GW closed by 2020a net decrease of at least 7.2 GW.
<snip>
MYTH #2: RENEWABLES UNDERMINE GRID RELIABILITY
Another common misreportage theme is that renewables are degrading the reliability of Germanys power supply, driving industry abroad. The president of Germanys network agency has confirmed this is not true. Hearsay anecdotes alleging renewable-caused power glitches are often traceable to Der Spiegel, a frequent source of anti-renewable stories, but evaporate on scrutiny. Charles Mann in The Atlantic cites five references to bolster such claims, but his sources (cited in my response) dont support his case. One, from a Koch-allied anti-renewable front group (whose political arm, the American Energy Alliance, lobbies for fossil fuels and against renewables), claims renewables are causing havoc in the German grid, the other four sources dont, and none of the five offers any evidence this is happening, because its notas I confirmed with German experts in May 2013, when I was co-keynoting the Chancellors electromobility conference in Berlin.
<snip>
MYTH #3: RENEWABLES SUBSIDIES ARE CRATERING THE GERMANY ECONOMY
More at http://blog.rmi.org/separating_fact_from_fiction_in_accounts_of_germanys_renewables_revolution
xchrom
(108,903 posts)mbperrin
(7,672 posts)Thanks!
jpak
(41,742 posts)I fucking hate the LaRouchites.
yup
kristopher
(29,798 posts)He's been working to address the cause of climate change from the day he stepped onto the world stage in 76.