Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumReddit's science section has banned climate change-denying trolls
LBN thread http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014675521
but I figured it was worth a repost here too, where it'll have more longevity.
Source: New Statesman
One of the site's largest subreddits, r/science, has had enough of angry, conspiracy-spouting posters who do nothing but ruin legitimate debate.
Reddits science section - r/science - is one of the sites default sections (or subreddits in the sites parlance), and is one of the main places on the internet where experts and lay people can come together and chat about science. Its moderators, like the rest of those in charge of subreddits, have to juggle the site communitys strong belief in free speech with the need to prevent arguments, trolling, or anything else that could derail genuine scientific debate.
Thats why theyve taken the step to ban climate change deniers from the subreddit. One of the moderators, chemist Nathan Allen, has written a blog post to explain why the decision was made (Ive picked out the key paragraphs):
I used to work as a barman in a pub with a semi-famous regular who obsessively tried to argue that renewable energy was a scam and nuclear power was a better option, and who would pick drunken arguments with other regulars about it just for the sake of it. It was very weird, and it made uncomfortable, so we barred them. This is a bit like that.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.newstatesman.com/future-proof/2013/12/reddits-science-section-has-banned-climate-change-denying-trolls
One of the site's largest subreddits, r/science, has had enough of angry, conspiracy-spouting posters who do nothing but ruin legitimate debate.
Reddits science section - r/science - is one of the sites default sections (or subreddits in the sites parlance), and is one of the main places on the internet where experts and lay people can come together and chat about science. Its moderators, like the rest of those in charge of subreddits, have to juggle the site communitys strong belief in free speech with the need to prevent arguments, trolling, or anything else that could derail genuine scientific debate.
Thats why theyve taken the step to ban climate change deniers from the subreddit. One of the moderators, chemist Nathan Allen, has written a blog post to explain why the decision was made (Ive picked out the key paragraphs):
While evolution and vaccines do have their detractors, no topic consistently evokes such rude, uninformed, and outspoken opinions as climate change. Instead of the reasoned and civil conversations that arise in most threads, when it came to climate change the comment sections became a battleground.
...
After some time interacting with the regular denier posters, it became clear that they could not or would not improve their demeanor. These problematic users were not the common internet trolls looking to have a little fun upsetting people. Such users are practically the norm on reddit. These people were true believers, blind to the fact that their arguments were hopelessly flawed, the result of cherry-picked data and conspiratorial thinking.
...
We discovered that the disruptive faction that bombarded climate change posts was actually substantially smaller than it had seemed. Just a small handful of people ran all of the most offensive accounts. What looked like a substantial group of objective skeptics to the outside observer was actually just a few bitter and biased posters with more opinions then evidence.
Negating the ability of this misguided group to post to the forum quickly resulted in a change in the culture within the comments. Where once there were personal insults and bitter accusations, there is now discussion of the relevant aspects of the research.
I used to work as a barman in a pub with a semi-famous regular who obsessively tried to argue that renewable energy was a scam and nuclear power was a better option, and who would pick drunken arguments with other regulars about it just for the sake of it. It was very weird, and it made uncomfortable, so we barred them. This is a bit like that.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.newstatesman.com/future-proof/2013/12/reddits-science-section-has-banned-climate-change-denying-trolls
More at the LBN thread http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014675521
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 722 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reddit's science section has banned climate change-denying trolls (Original Post)
Electric Monk
Dec 2013
OP
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)1. K&R&LOL
Excellent!
hatrack
(59,587 posts)2. GOOD!
About Goddamned time.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)3. There's an outstanding lesson in that for DUEE.
Thanks for sharing this.
Nihil
(13,508 posts)4. Hardly ... there's at least eight who've found that out already ...