Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumUsing Nuclear Power to Extract Oil?
April 27, 2009, 9:35 am
Using Nuclear Power to Extract Oil?
By JOHN LORINC
Oil sands
Mining trucks carry loads of oil-laden sand at the Albian Sands project in Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada.
The Associated Press
After several years of speculation, the Alberta government last month released a long-awaited experts report on nuclear power and oil sands and has now embarked on a series of province-wide public consultations.
The move comes on the heels of a decision last month by Bruce Power, a private company that operates a publicly-owned nuclear station in western Ontario, to seek approval to build a $10 billion nuclear station at a site known as Whitemud, about 310 miles northwest of Edmonton.
Bruce Power hopes to begin an environmental assessment next year. Its proposal calls for two to four 1,000-megawatt reactors, with three vendors Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Westinghouse and Areva competing to supply the equipment.
According to the expert panel report, almost 90 percent of Albertas electricity comes from coal or natural gas, and demand is projected to jump 74 percent within the next 15 years, largely due to the needs of the oil sands projects which consumes roughly 1 billion cubic feet of natural gas daily.
At the same time, the National Energy Board has projected a drop in long-term natural gas production in Western Canada...
Using Nuclear Power to Extract Oil?
By JOHN LORINC
Oil sands
Mining trucks carry loads of oil-laden sand at the Albian Sands project in Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada.
The Associated Press
After several years of speculation, the Alberta government last month released a long-awaited experts report on nuclear power and oil sands and has now embarked on a series of province-wide public consultations.
The move comes on the heels of a decision last month by Bruce Power, a private company that operates a publicly-owned nuclear station in western Ontario, to seek approval to build a $10 billion nuclear station at a site known as Whitemud, about 310 miles northwest of Edmonton.
Bruce Power hopes to begin an environmental assessment next year. Its proposal calls for two to four 1,000-megawatt reactors, with three vendors Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Westinghouse and Areva competing to supply the equipment.
According to the expert panel report, almost 90 percent of Albertas electricity comes from coal or natural gas, and demand is projected to jump 74 percent within the next 15 years, largely due to the needs of the oil sands projects which consumes roughly 1 billion cubic feet of natural gas daily.
At the same time, the National Energy Board has projected a drop in long-term natural gas production in Western Canada...
http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/using-nuclear-power-to-extract-oil/?_r=0
Toshiba Nuclear Reactor For Oil Sands To Be Operational By 2020: Reports
The Huffington Post Canada | Posted: 01/18/2013 2:27 pm EST | Updated: 01/18/2013
Toshiba Corporation has developed a small nuclear reactor to power oil sands extraction in Alberta and hopes to have it operational by 2020, according to news reports from Japan.
The Daily Yomiuri reports Toshiba is building the reactor at the request of an unnamed oilsands company.
The reactor would generate between one per cent and 5 per cent as much energy as produced by a typical nuclear power plant, and would not need refueling for 30 years. It would be used to heat water in order to create the steam used to extract bitumen from the oil sands.
Toshiba has completed design work on the reactor and has filed for approval with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Nikkei.com reported. The company is expected to seek approval from Canadian authorities as well...
The Huffington Post Canada | Posted: 01/18/2013 2:27 pm EST | Updated: 01/18/2013
Toshiba Corporation has developed a small nuclear reactor to power oil sands extraction in Alberta and hopes to have it operational by 2020, according to news reports from Japan.
The Daily Yomiuri reports Toshiba is building the reactor at the request of an unnamed oilsands company.
The reactor would generate between one per cent and 5 per cent as much energy as produced by a typical nuclear power plant, and would not need refueling for 30 years. It would be used to heat water in order to create the steam used to extract bitumen from the oil sands.
Toshiba has completed design work on the reactor and has filed for approval with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Nikkei.com reported. The company is expected to seek approval from Canadian authorities as well...
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/01/18/toshiba-oil-sands-reactor_n_2505738.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1851 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Using Nuclear Power to Extract Oil? (Original Post)
kristopher
Jan 2014
OP
They actually tested it. I didn't know that. I'd heard of Project Cauldron...
kristopher
Jan 2014
#5
phantom power
(25,966 posts)1. This has never made much sense to me. Is the EROI even > 1?
kristopher
(29,798 posts)2. What about petroleum in general makes sense with what we now know?
The EROI is the last thing I'd worry about with any tar sands project.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)3. Sure, there's plenty to hate about it.
At some point, we cross the threshold of literally throwing energy away to get it, which strikes me as one of those crucial sanity-questioning milestones.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)4. A bad idea and I hope they don't repeat Operation Gas Buggy
Which was using a nuclear device to "crack" rock instead of fracking (fluid cracking)
Project Gas Buggy
kristopher
(29,798 posts)5. They actually tested it. I didn't know that. I'd heard of Project Cauldron...
Also known as Project Oilsands.
... was a 1958 proposal to exploit the Athabasca Oil Sands in Albertavia the underground detonation of up to 100 nuclear bombs...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Oilsand
Thanks for the link.