Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumGrad Student PWNS Harvard President On FF Divestment In Long, Must-Read Letter
EDIT
The plan you have put forth as an alternative to divestmentthat Harvard, through a strategy of shareholder activism, will induce fossil fuel companies to become clean energy companiesis a proposition that requires evidence to demonstrate its seriousness and feasibility. I am not aware of evidence to suggest that: (1) fossil fuel companies have any interest in becoming clean energy companies anytime soon, if ever; (2) that it is possible for such companies to become clean energy companies while maintaining fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders; (3) that shareholder activism is capable of inducing such fundamental shifts in business strategy; or (4) that Harvard, as an activist shareholder, has such power.
Your repeated preference of this plan indicates either that you are privy to evidence regarding its feasibility that others are not privy to, that you are naïve regarding the feasibility of this plan or that this plan is proposed cynically. If you do have special information that supports the feasibility of this plan, it should be made public. Without such evidence, there is no reason to believe that this plan is both serious and well informed.
The same need for evidence applies to your statement that divesting from fossil fuel companies will cause a significant loss of revenue for the University. This may very well be true, but, again, evidence to support that conclusion is needed. Various studies to date have indicated that divestment from fossil fuel companies need not result in significant financial losses. Do these studies not apply to Harvards endowment, in full or in part? Are there other losses of revenue that concern you besides investment returns, such as corporate and private donations? Or are your concerns less tangible?
It is right for you to act as a steward of Harvards financial health. However, when your statements run counter to the body of evidence, it is necessary to provide compelling evidence of your own. It is never enough to say, Dont kid yourselfdivesting will hurt the University financially. Calls for divestment are not made in jest. Climate change is and will be a matter of life and death for many. The lack of evidence brought to the table thus far by you and the rest of the Harvard Corporation, however, does suggest a lack of seriousness.
Other statements of yours indicate, to my mind, a lack of seriousness that is troubling, such as your suggestion to me during our last meeting that if Harvard divests from fossil fuels, the University will need to decide whether to divest from sugar. Surely you understand that fossil fuels and sugar are distinct in a number of fundamental ways. One of those ways, perhaps the main one, is that the production and consumption of sugar does not degrade the habitability of the planet for modern human civilization.
EDIT
http://climatechangepsychology.blogspot.com/2014/03/why-we-must-divest-fossil-fuels-students-open-letter-harvard-president-drew-faust.html
Adam051188
(711 posts)"HARVARD: Are you a millionaire? Is your kid a decent student? come buy our label! People still think it's worth something!"
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)on second thought she's probably just fearful of killing the golden egg laying goose that is the fossil fuel industry.
My school is big on being a leader in reducing it's carbon footprint and environmental sustainability. Here is some analysis that people who support public universities divesting from fossil fuel industries might find interesting.
http://www.uwosh.edu/es/climate-change/divestment/analyses-of-divestment