Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumCNN Just Reporting: . KXL measure lacks the 60 votes needed for construction
Last edited Fri May 2, 2014, 01:48 PM - Edit history (1)
Great news. This has to be stopped.
Thank You Nebraska for standing your ground.
Thanks to the 60 Senators who can hold this vote up.
Hope they don't change their minds
packman
(16,296 posts)Are you saying 60 out of 100 senators are against it?
Gore1FL
(21,134 posts)Indyfan53
(473 posts)Halle-fucking-lujah! We are being heard!
GOTV IN NOVEMBER!!!!
riqster
(13,986 posts)Sanity Claws
(21,850 posts)60 votes total are needed to pass something and avoid a filibuster that would prevent a vote.
If something fell 60 votes short, then nobody supported it. Is that accurate? Or is CNN just its usual inaccurate self?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)...or maybe the short senators are not voting
or the senators voting in favor are two short, or too short.
Could be any of the above, or none...
Sanity Claws
(21,850 posts)Voting in shorts = short votes?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)That is a definite possibility, although short on sanity.
!!
muriel_volestrangler
(101,336 posts)but that seems unlikely to the reporter:
...
The legislations authors -- Republican Senator John Hoeven of North Dakota and Democratic Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana -- said they have 56 supporters -- four shy of whats needed to end delaying tactics by opponents and make the vote anything more than an election-year gambit putting supporters on record for voters back home.
Hoeven said all 45 Senate Republicans, along with 11 Democrats, support his legislation, and now he and Landrieu have six or seven Democrats in their sights, yet dont yet have any takers. The bill is S.2280.
The targets are Democrats who in March 2013 joined Republicans to pass a nonbinding resolution backing the pipeline with 62 votes.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-05-01/wooing-of-wavering-senators-to-force-keystone-seen-falling-short
Cartoonist
(7,320 posts)The targets are Democrats who in March 2013 joined Republicans to pass a nonbinding resolution backing the pipeline with 62 votes.
-
The spineless just need a little more cash.
navarth
(5,927 posts)She's a sponsor of this and just recently I got emails from some Democratic organization asking me to send her money. 'Support Mary Landrieu'!
Fuck that.
Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #7)
navarth This message was self-deleted by its author.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)not a Legislative Branch power. The President must approve the pipeline, and acquire two-thirds of the Senate to approve it. Just the Senate.
Who are they kidding?
Sam
muriel_volestrangler
(101,336 posts)in both chambers. Maybe their idea is that since Obama says he's undecided, a majority vote in both chambers (assuming the Repub majority in the House will vote for Oil) will get him to leap off the fence onto their side. But that doesn't seem a 'bypass' to me.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)And he is a Constitutional expert so I am thinking he is pretty familiar with the text of the law.
It is we the people these legislators are trying to sucker-punch. They think we cannot read or do not know the law. After all, many of us went to public schools....
Sam
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)either read the US Constitution or took, and passed, 8th grade Civics ... or maybe both.
Brava!
Samantha
(9,314 posts)I remember thinking I was the only one in class who found civics fascinating! Still do.
Sam
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Will repost this headline
For clarification.