Harper Orders Canadian Gov. Meteorologists To Speak Only Of Weather, Never Climate

[hatrack]

Meteorologists are paid to talk expansively about the weather. But in Canada, they have to choose their words a little more carefully.

The government has made it clear that none of the meteorologists on its payroll should be talking about climate change, according to a new report. It’s unclear how long this rule has been in effect, but Environment Canada, the government entity that shares weather and meteorological information publicly, explained its position in a statement to us.

“Our Weather Preparedness Meteorologists are experts in their field of severe weather and speak to this subject. Questions about climate change or long-term trends would be directed to a climatologist or other applicable authority,” said Danny Kingsberry, a spokesman for Environment Canada. Some scientists aren’t too happy about it. “It’s all very scary,” said Dr. Chris Metcalfe, Director of the Institute for Watershed Science at Trent University. “It’s all about controlling the message. In my estimation the government doesn’t want the work of environmentalists running counter to their official policies.”

Environment Canada declined to answer additional questions, but Dr. Metcalfe says the rules around referencing climate change are part of a broader effort by the government to muzzle scientists whose messaging interferes with key industries. He says some of his peers in government are calling it quits rather than abide by Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s language police, “Several scientists are choosing to retire over their unhappiness with the present situation,” he says.

EDIT

http://www.vocativ.com/culture/science/canada-clamps-scientists-talking-climate-change/

[riverbendviewgal]

1. I believe, it

Kick and rec

[daleanime]

2. kick, kick, kick.....

[KurtNYC]

3. Likely that some have models showing which areas will suffer the worst effects

from on-going climate change. Such models will be key to exploiting shifts in real estate values as flood plains change and expand. Trillions of dollars are in play in this.

Think of California agriculture, now in year 4 of drought. The value of farmland in California is well above the $24K per acre that one would pay in Lancaster PA but models may show that Lancaster has a better future than the central valley if CA. As long as something like this is not common knowledge, the major players can sell the doomed farmland while buying up the future winners.

Information is power.

[GeorgeGist]

4. Ted Cruz might want to move home.

[phantom power]

5. For an encore he will pass a law that pi = 3

[snagglepuss]

6. k and r