Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumUK Env. Sec. Blames Own Department, Not For Redacted Fracking Report, But For Creating It At All
Liz Truss, the environment secretary, turned on her own department yesterday as the Tory government came under increasing criticism for its heavy-handed redactions to a controversial report about fracking. Truss, a Conservative member of the Cabinet, told the House of Commons there are no plans for the release of an unredacted version of the incedury Shale Gas: Rural Economy Impacts report and blamed her own officials at the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).
She complained that Defra should never have produced the report. The economic impact of fracking is a matter for the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC), she argued. She said the report was not analytically robust and was not signed off by Ministers. This echoes statements made by Amber Rudd, the Under Secretary of State at DECC, on Monday during the Infrastructure Bill debate. The Tory told MPs that the report was prepared by a junior member in another department and it was not appropriate for them to have done so.
Labour were quick to attack the government. Maria Eagle, shadow environment secretary, said: Ministers have responsibility for what is done in their Department. The report has been so heavily redacted that even the name of its author has been removed.
Given that the Government has now caved in to Labours demand for extensive and robust regulation, without which there can be no fracking for shale gas, why does the Secretary of State not now publish the report, unredacted, in the interests of full transparency?
EDIT
http://www.desmog.uk/2015/01/30/flustered-liz-truss-blames-civil-servants-redacted-fracking-report-fiasco
djean111
(14,255 posts)Given that the Government has now caved in to Labours demand for extensive and robust regulation,
Well, Maria Eagle, rest assured that when the TTIP is in place, outside companies who want to frack can sue Great Britain in a corporate court, in order to overturn that heinous and inconvenient extensive and robust regulation.