Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:00 AM Feb 2015

Electric Vs Hydrogen: Who's Ahead?

http://www.autoworldnews.com/articles/13161/20150218/electric-vs-hydrogen-whos-ahead.htm
[font face=Serif][font size=5]Electric Vs Hydrogen: Who's Ahead?[/font]

Feb 18, 2015 06:30 PM EST | Jordan Ecarma (j.ecarma@autoworldnews.com)

[font size=3]Automakers have long been debating electric versus hydrogen when it comes to alternative fuel, and for the moment at least, hydrogen fuel cells seem to be ahead.

The potentially game-changing Hyundai Tucson can be refueled in less than 10 minutes, according to the automaker, and "makes the transition from gasoline to hydrogen as seamless as possible," said a report from Automotive News.

"The hydrogen fuel cell debate is no longer a chicken-and-egg conundrum. The fuel cell vehicle has arrived first. It works," wrote Richard Truett after driving the Hyundai Tucson.

The compact sport-utility vehicle, which uses fuel cell technology to convert hydrogen into electricity, has received an approving nod from Consumer Reports as well.

…[/font][/font]


http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Apple-s-electric-car-dreams-carry-challenges-6086121.php
[font face=Serif][font size=5]Apple’s electric car dreams carry challenges[/font]

By David Welch and Dana Hull | Published 4:26 pm, Tuesday, February 17, 2015

[font size=3]…

Electric cars are still a tiny portion of global sales. Nissan needed three years to sell 100,000 Leafs. Tesla’s record was 31,655 of the Model S last year in an industry that sells more than 100 million vehicles a year. The company plans to sell 55,000 this year and is still losing money.



The California Air Resources Board, whose clean-air rules for cars tend to be adopted by many other states and also influence federal emissions standards, requires automakers to produce a certain percentage of zero-emission vehicles for sale in the state. They can be hydrogen fuel cell-powered, electric or hybrid vehicles.

Changes to the regulations now favor hydrogen-powered vehicles because they can be refueled faster than electric cars can be recharged and can often drive longer before needing to fill up. Also, state tax rebates for hydrogen fuel cells can be double that given to buyers of electric cars. These incentive programs may start to turn the tide toward hydrogen over electric drive, Noble said.

Both Toyota and Honda plan to sell fuel-cell vehicles in the U.S. this year. Toyota has wound down its electric RAV4 sport utility vehicle and Honda stopped selling the electric Fit subcompact.

…[/font][/font]
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Electric Vs Hydrogen: Who's Ahead? (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Feb 2015 OP
Interesting! I wonder how much energy is needed to create the fuel? arcane1 Feb 2015 #1
Electric is ahead of Hydrogen. Only advantage of H2 is quick refueling, lighter weight. NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #2
Where did those 115 volts come from? OKIsItJustMe Feb 2015 #3
30% renewable, 27% natural gas, 21% nuclear, and other. NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #6
I see, “Hydrogen, it's just claptrap from the corporations.” OKIsItJustMe Feb 2015 #7
Look, if the best you can do is pick the one word, "corporations" as your best defense... NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #8
Why is buying electricity from a corporation somehow better than buying hydrogen from a corporation? OKIsItJustMe Feb 2015 #10
I didn't say it was. Charging at home and work is cheaper and cleaner!!! NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #12
Home fuelling with hydrogen is also possible, although I doubt it will be common. OKIsItJustMe Feb 2015 #18
Of course, brilliant! Home Hydrogen Refilling right on the street, that's gonna happen! NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #21
NYC_SKP: “…people who live in, say, NYC don't own cars…” OKIsItJustMe Feb 2015 #23
Doh, you caught me! I was thinking New York, NY. So what was your point about street charging again? NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #24
“What won't happen is 1M H2 vehicles, ever.” OKIsItJustMe Feb 2015 #25
Simple Reason... electricity can't be singled-out for bad treatment... quadrature Feb 2015 #15
Heres an opinion from man with some expertise in the field CentralMass Feb 2015 #4
The only opinion that really matters is that of the consumer OKIsItJustMe Feb 2015 #5
That is true but it appears that these hdrogen powered vehicles are in the $50k and above range CentralMass Feb 2015 #9
And a Tesla is even more expensive… OKIsItJustMe Feb 2015 #11
Here are some more down to earth electric vehicles. CentralMass Feb 2015 #14
Given that they’re so affordable… OKIsItJustMe Feb 2015 #19
That's a great article, thank you for posting it. NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #13
The Players are taking the field- the game hasn't officially started yet! nationalize the fed Feb 2015 #16
Using incorrect units is not conducive to people taking your argument seriously Fumesucker Feb 2015 #17
And they use articles that have nothing to do with vehicles, like the Walmart one. NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #20
Oh! I’m sorry… I didn’t realize you’d asked to see one! (You must have asked someone else!) OKIsItJustMe Feb 2015 #26
ROFL! Oh, and Walmart's use has nothing to do with this discussion. NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #22
Touting Hydrogen as the answer is an attempt to head off home-made electricity powering cars dpbrown Feb 2015 #27
Electric vehicle completely shatter many existing business models. hunter Feb 2015 #28
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
2. Electric is ahead of Hydrogen. Only advantage of H2 is quick refueling, lighter weight.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:11 AM
Feb 2015

And the quick refueling only matters on long trips, and with fast DC charging will matter less and less.

The BIGGEST disadvantage to Hydrogen is that we will be OWNED by middleman fueling stations.

Electrics can be charged at home and at work, and for now an EV with onboard gas generator can make those long trips.

Hell, my Chevy Volt has gone over 8,000 miles on 47 gallons of gasoline and the electricity has come out of 115 volt household outlets.



Hydrogen, it's just claptrap from the corporations.

.

.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
3. Where did those 115 volts come from?
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:14 AM
Feb 2015

Did you generate them yourself? Or, did you buy them from a corporation?

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
6. 30% renewable, 27% natural gas, 21% nuclear, and other.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:26 AM
Feb 2015

.

Of course, with regenerative coasting and braking, much of the energy that would be lost in an H2 car is recouped in my Volt.

Also, Obama is pushing for more workplace charging and employees are responding well.

Very unlikely that they'll be so kind when it comes to providing Hydrogen.

Now it's true, I had to buy my electrons from an investor owned utility company, but that company is highly regulated by CARB, CPUC, and since decoupling is actually encouraged to sell less energy.

And, they offer EV owners special energy rates which, for some owners, have resulted in lower monthly energy charges.

Not all corporations are evil schemers trying to sell magical hydrogen cars and infrastructure.

Facts, baby!



OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
7. I see, “Hydrogen, it's just claptrap from the corporations.”
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:28 AM
Feb 2015

However, your electric company is regulated… unlike… uh…

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
8. Look, if the best you can do is pick the one word, "corporations" as your best defense...
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:34 AM
Feb 2015

...then I'll assume that you've got little more to say.

Somebody out there, energy interests and the automobile industries and petroleum marketers, do NOT want to lose their franchise on the fueling station model.

They are corporations, largely, or corporate groups, and the fact that utilities are also corporations doesn't change these facts:

Current transportation interests don't want to lose their corner on the transportation fuel market and Hydrogen is one way to keep it.

PEOPLE who want freedom from this virtual monopoly can have freedom from them with Electric Vehicles, but not with Hydrogen.

I'm for the people, the drivers, the owners, the little guys.

I'm not for the people trying to keep us dependent on their business model when we can just plug in anywhere without them.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
10. Why is buying electricity from a corporation somehow better than buying hydrogen from a corporation?
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:40 AM
Feb 2015

What is so bad about a hydrogen fueling station? Last I knew, you were emphasizing the convenience of “supercharger stations,” which is a good thing™. Right?

We’ll see what the consumers decide.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
12. I didn't say it was. Charging at home and work is cheaper and cleaner!!!
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:51 AM
Feb 2015

.

Hydrogen fueling stations will have the exclusive franchise, a monopoly, on providing fuel to H2 cars.

But EVs can use superchargers, or Level 2 NRG or PG&E or other public stations OR Level 2 home stations or simple 115 volt receptacles.

That is a lot of choices for EVs versus no choices for Hydrogen, or one choice, the H2 filling station owned by someone else.

Consumers will stay with EVs, I suspect.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
18. Home fuelling with hydrogen is also possible, although I doubt it will be common.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 09:16 AM
Feb 2015

The thing which battery supporters refuse to acknowledge is that home charging works in suburbia, in a house with an attached garage. Home charging does not work well with on-street parking for example.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
21. Of course, brilliant! Home Hydrogen Refilling right on the street, that's gonna happen!
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 11:11 AM
Feb 2015

Right on the street!

Actually, to be serious, people who live in, say, NYC don't own cars and if they do they don't drive them so much.

But even if they did, the park at work and CHARGE at work.

Look at the push our government is making toward more workplace (ev) charging:

http://energy.gov/eere/vehicles/ev-everywhere-workplace-charging-challenge


OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
23. NYC_SKP: “…people who live in, say, NYC don't own cars…”
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 12:31 PM
Feb 2015

Interesting… (The “NYC” in “NYC_SKP” stands for…?)

http://www.nycedc.com/blog-entry/new-yorkers-and-cars


Yes, there’s been a years-long push by the Obama administration behind battery-electric cars, and plug-in hybrids (like your Volt™.) Despite that, sales have been far short of the goal.

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/2015/01/22/ev-goal-million/22176225/

[font face=Serif][font size=5]Official: U.S. will not meet 1 million EV goal in 2015[/font]

David Shepardson, The Detroit News 10:49 p.m. EST January 22, 2015

[font size=3]Washington — Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz said Thursday the United States will not meet President Obama’s goal of getting 1 million electric vehicles on the road by the end of this year, and said hitting the target could be a few years away.

“We’re going to be a few years after the president’s aspirational goal of the end of 2015, but I think that we are within a few years of reaching that goal,” Moniz said in a Detroit News interview after an appearance at the Washington auto show.

In his 2011 State of the Union Address, Obama renewed a call he made as a candidate in 2008: to get 1 million plug-in electric vehicles on the road by 2015. But sales have been far slower than expected — about 280,000, including 120,000 in 2014.

Automakers have been forced to cut prices on many EVs and have scaled back expectations on sales. But automakers are unveiling a number of electric vehicles. General Motors Co. announced last week a concept EV — the Chevrolet Bolt — that will be able to go up to 200 miles on a single charge.

…[/font][/font]
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
24. Doh, you caught me! I was thinking New York, NY. So what was your point about street charging again?
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:17 PM
Feb 2015

You:

The thing which battery supporters refuse to acknowledge is that home charging works in suburbia, in a house with an attached garage. Home charging does not work well with on-street parking for example.


My point is still valid, people increasingly can charge at work. If they don't work, they'll be able to fast charge while shopping. H2 just ain't gonna happen on the street anywhere, or in your garage if you have one.

If we don't make the 1M EV goal it doesn't mean the technology will fail.

What won't happen is 1M H2 vehicles, ever.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
25. “What won't happen is 1M H2 vehicles, ever.”
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 04:01 PM
Feb 2015

We will see…

California is installing H₂ pumps at existing gas stations (much as I recall the diesel pumps showing up in the 70’s.)

The auto manufacturers will help with this (just as Tesla is building charging stations.)

California will be the first place. Connecticut may be next. Presumably, New York will follow shortly thereafter.
http://ens-newswire.com/2014/05/30/eight-u-s-states-unveil-ambitious-zev-action-plan/

[font face=Serif][font size=5]Eight U.S. States Unveil Ambitious ZEV Action Plan[/font]

May 30, 2014 5:27 am

[font size=3]SACRAMENTO, California, May 30, 2014 (ENS) – An alliance of eight U.S. states Thursday announced a plan to put 3.3 million zero emission vehicles on the road by the year 2025 and establish a fueling infrastructure to support this number of vehicles.

The alliance behind the Multi-State ZEV Action Plan includes: California, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island and Vermont.



Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy called the plan “a triple win for participating states because it brings energy, environmental, and economic benefits.”

“Under the blueprint provided in this plan,” said Malloy, “we will continue with our efforts to provide a convenient network of charging stations for electric vehicles, add EVs and fuel cell vehicles to the state’s fleet, and build out the hydrogen infrastructure needed for fuel cell vehicles expected to be available for the 2015 model year.”

…[/font][/font]


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464285914703463
[font face=Serif][font size=5]Air Liquide, Toyota plan northeastern US hydrogen fuel network[/font]

[font size=3]Industrial gases giant Air Liquide has announced plans to develop and supply a fully integrated hydrogen fueling infrastructure in the northeastern US, in collaboration with Toyota Motor Sales USA. The new network – well away from the more established, expanding infrastructure in California [see the Honda item below] – is intended to support Toyota's introduction of its new Mirai hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle and its plans to deliver hydrogen FCEVs in the US [FCB, November 2014, p1].

Air Liquide's hydrogen fueling infrastructure in the northeastern US will initially consist of 12 stations, with plans to extend the network if there is sufficient demand. The hydrogen stations developed by Air Liquide will offer a typical refueling experience, allowing FCEV drivers to fill up in less than 5 minutes.

The network of hydrogen stations will run through New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island. Chris Hostetter, VP of strategic planning for Toyota Motor Sales, says that these states and locations have been strategically selected to support the greater New York and Boston areas, as well as provide the backbone of a hydrogen highway for the northeastern corridor. Like the California infrastructure, the plan is supported by collaborative efforts with regional state governments.

This initiative is the latest in Air Liquide's portfolio of hydrogen fuel cell energy activities in North America, which also include recently awarded hydrogen fueling stations in California |FCB, May 2014, p7|, and a number of fleet fueling projects for public buses and warehouse vehicles |FCB, May 2014, p2|.

…[/font][/font]
 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
15. Simple Reason... electricity can't be singled-out for bad treatment...
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 05:55 AM
Feb 2015

because so many people use electricity.

on the other hand,
when politicians want to punish
the working class,
hydrogen is an obvious target

CentralMass

(15,265 posts)
4. Heres an opinion from man with some expertise in the field
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:18 AM
Feb 2015
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/08/05/3467115/tesla-toyota-hydrogen-cars-batteries.

I'd put my $$ on electric. Producing hydrogen, compressing it, and converting it back into energy is not efficient, green, or economical.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
5. The only opinion that really matters is that of the consumer
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:22 AM
Feb 2015

Right now, not many are buying Battery Electric Vehicles (BEV’s.) They may not buy Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEV’s) either. Only time will tell…

CentralMass

(15,265 posts)
9. That is true but it appears that these hdrogen powered vehicles are in the $50k and above range
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:37 AM
Feb 2015

and articles I've read indicate that the mfg's are taking a loss on them. Also, try to get a real price/cost of the hydrogen from any of the refueling stations in states like California. I doubt you can. They are basically giving it away to sell the gimmick. Hydrogen is more costly than gas or diesel or natural gas and electric vehicle are significantly more efficient.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
11. And a Tesla is even more expensive…
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:42 AM
Feb 2015

…although their current offering is less expensive than their initial offering…

I wonder if the same might happen with fuel cell vehicles…

CentralMass

(15,265 posts)
14. Here are some more down to earth electric vehicles.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 02:30 AM
Feb 2015
http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1080871_electric-car-price-guide-every-2012-2013-plug-in-car-with-specs
"2014 Mitsubishi i-MiEV - $23,845
16 kWh battery, 62 miles (EPA), 112 MPGe, 49 kW motor

Mitsubishi's jellybean-style electric car has never been a strong seller in the U.S, but the Japanese automaker recently slashed its pricing, making it the cheapest electric vehicle on the market. You're still saddled with low performance and those unusual looks, but some owners could drive from a dealership having paid less than $16,000 for their i-MiEV, if they're able to maximize their use of incentives.

2014 smart fortwo electric drive - $25,750
17.6 kWh battery, 68 miles (EPA), 107 MPGe, 55 kW motor

Smart's Fortwo Electric Drive is one of the cheapest new electric cars on the market. You only get two seats, but you also get rid of the gasoline car's jerky transmission. There's enough power to make good progress now, and if you're able to benefit from incentives, the price starts to look quite tempting. Convertible models are an extra $3,000 but top-down electric driving is a wholly pleasant experience.

2014 Chevrolet Spark EV - $27,495
20 kWh battery, 82 miles (EPA), 119 MPGe, 110 kW motor

Chevrolet has put the same effort into its diminutive Spark as it did the Volt, and has managed to improve the aerodynamics and interior to match the Spark's electric aspirations. With huge torque on offer, performance is strong and the Spark EV is good fun to drive.

2014 Nissan Leaf - $29,830
24 kWh battery, 75 miles (EPA), 115 MPGe, 80 kW motor

The Leaf is one of the better-known electric cars. While sales haven't matched Nissan's expectations and there have been issues with battery degradation in hot weather, the Leaf is still one of the most usable electric cars on the market. 2013's price drop made the Leaf one of the more affordable electric cars on the market.

2014 Toyota Prius Plug-In Hybrid - $30,800
5.2 kWh battery, 11 miles (EPA blended), 6 miles (EPA all-EV), 95 MPGe, 60 kW motor (134-hp combined)

The Prius Plug-In is a little off the pace technologically these days, but its similarity to the regular, familiar hybrid means it's ideal for drivers trading up from a regular Prius. The short all-electric range is disappointing to some--but in terms of sales, it's actually one of the better-selling plug-ins around.

2014 Fiat 500e - $32,650
24 kWh battery, 87 miles (EPA), 116 MPGe,

Fiat's 500e electric car may be a mere "compliance car", but the engineers have done a great job--it's nippy, fun to drive and probably a better vehicle than the gasoline version. Limited availability is a hindrance, though, and the price is pretty steep for such a small car. Oh, and Fiat's boss would prefer you didn't buy one--it's costing him money...

2014 Ford C-MAX Energi - $33,745
7.6 kWh battery, 19 miles (EPA), 88 MPGe, 88 kW motor (195-hp combined)

Ford's first plug-in hybrid challenger mixes good performance with impressive efficiency in electric mode. Like the Toyota Prius V, it's a practical vehicle too, ready to handle everything family life can throw at it.

2014 Chevrolet Volt - $34,995
16.5 kWh battery, 38 miles (EPA), 98 MPGe, 111 kW motor"

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
19. Given that they’re so affordable…
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 10:19 AM
Feb 2015

…why aren’t they selling better?

In 2014, the Tesla Model S sold better than any of the others except the Nissan LEAF™ and the Chevy Volt™ (the Volt™ and the Tesla Model S sold virtually the same number.)
http://cleantechnica.com/2015/01/07/100-electric-cars-58-us-2014/

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
13. That's a great article, thank you for posting it.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 01:58 AM
Feb 2015

It pretty much puts away any pro-hydrogen claptrap.

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
16. The Players are taking the field- the game hasn't officially started yet!
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 06:39 AM
Feb 2015

a bit early to call for a winner. In just 3 months this matchup starts when Toyota sells its first H2 car in CA. Honda is in the Bull Pen already- watching closely and working behind the scenes.

And since Hydrogen vehicles *are* electric vehicles-- "Battery Only vs. Hydrogen Fuel Cell + Battery" would be a more appropriate title.

This so called war between battery fanatics and fuel cellers is a bunch of bullshite. It's the battery fanatics that don't want fuel cells or hydrogen even discussed. They're the ones yelling and screaming the loudest. There has always been anti hydrogen people but the latest round started when Elon Musk smeared the tech:

“And then they’ll say certain technologies like fuel cell … oh god … fuel cell is so bullshit. Except in a rocket," said Musk in 2013.


Musk slams fuel cell tech every chance he gets, laughing about "fool cells" and so many of his followers think it's fun to slime and mock hydrogen advocates. There's not a lot of H2 advocates sliming batteries and BEV advocates. It's mostly a one way street. And Musk has walked pretty far down that very street, he's a fool for sliming tech that took the US to the Moon and is now heavily supported by the top car makers in the world. It's Toyota, Hyundai, VW, and Honda against a guy that loves himself and a boatload of people that literally know nothing about Hydrogen other than "Hindenburg".

Typical H2 Bashing "debate":

You keep putting your money on hydrogen crap you stupid B|TCH and by the time the first 10,000 hydrogen cars actually hit the road, there will be a couple of million EVs on the road. LMAO!!!--"topkill222"


Enough with the hydrogen. Its a poor use of the original energy source to make it and who wants to be tethered to an oil company owned expensive fueling station...--"MrEnergyCzar"


Repeatedly, H2 bashers call for "an end to discussion"- maybe they'd support making further hydrogen research illegal. Most of these are probably just emotional, ignorant Battery Fanatics but some are no doubt professionals. "There can be no further improvements to Hydrogen Tech" is another good one. Why not support any and all research into anything that holds potential?

Consider also that Wal-Mart and other big players are in the midst of switching out the batteries in their forklifts to fuel cells. Why would they do that if there was no future in H2?

Walmart Doubles Down on Hydrogen Fuel Cells
Walmart is dramatically increasing its investment in hydrogen fuel cells to get away from dirtier battery and fueling options, giving a boost to high-profile supplier Plug Power
http://www.forbes.com/sites/heatherclancy/2014/02/27/walmart-doubles-down-on-hydrogen-fuel-cells/


For now, the future looks like Fuel Cells + Batteries. Also Musk will either adapt (and eat words) or Tesla will die. Because Hydrogen beats the >1300 pound battery you have to lug around to get ~85+ kW of power- and one day replace. The current cost is > $20,000. A replacement Nissan Leaf battery is $5,000 + tax and installation. It's as much as another new used car.

In a few months, this FCV vs. BEV game will kick into high gear when Toyota puts the Mirai up for sale and begins to advertise. H2 is coming whether some people want it or not. That's a fact. It will be interesting to watch what happens.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
17. Using incorrect units is not conducive to people taking your argument seriously
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 09:15 AM
Feb 2015

The Tesla battery will put out far more than 85 kW, that big a car would be anemic with only 85 kW and anemic is distinctly not in the description of the Model S.

What you were doing up above is known as "nutpicking".

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=nutpicking

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
20. And they use articles that have nothing to do with vehicles, like the Walmart one.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 10:52 AM
Feb 2015

Hydrogen fuel cells uses as storage at fixed sites for backup or load shifting?, well that's got nothing to do with vehicles.

Some folks on this board REALLY want to keep drivers dependent upon a predatory distribution and filling station system.

In that sense, Hydrogen = Gasoline/Diesel.

That's the one matter they won't discuss.

I ask that they show me the home H2 Generation system and I get crickets.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
22. ROFL! Oh, and Walmart's use has nothing to do with this discussion.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 11:17 AM
Feb 2015

from your link:

Hydrogen fuel cells work by converting hydrogen and oxygen into electricity; their adoption has been challenged by the lack of fueling infrastructure, but that obstacle is fading. Plug Power’s cells are typically used for materials handling fleets in big warehouses or distribution centers, but the applications for its technology are expanding. In January, for example, Sprint announced it would start using them for backing up rooftop sites powering its wireless network instead of diesel generators. Nokia is embracing a similar strategy in Asia.


H2 makes sense as a replacement for stationary back up diesel generators and for fleets where many vehicles come home to the same central H2 storage system, like warehouses or delivery services.

But it will never happen that we'll see them on the street driven by ordinary citizens.

Magical Unicorn Hydrogen!

Good grief!

dpbrown

(6,391 posts)
27. Touting Hydrogen as the answer is an attempt to head off home-made electricity powering cars
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 06:07 PM
Feb 2015

Electric vehicles powered by home-generated solar electricity SHOULD be the wave of the future. But disentangling power generation from the massive companies we're literally tied into really irks corporatists.

hunter

(38,313 posts)
28. Electric vehicle completely shatter many existing business models.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 08:45 PM
Feb 2015

Hydrogen vehicles are just more of the same, you fuel up with hydrogen instead of gasoline, and like gasoline, that hydrogen is made from fossil fuels.

Electric vehicles powered by solar panels shading workplace parking lots is a big, big deal. People commuting back and forth to work and NEVER buying gasoline to do that, or even fossil fuel generated electricity to do that, it's an absolutely terrifying thought to anyone who sells fossil fuels.

Electric cars that last for half a million miles or more, with batteries that don't need to be replaced for longer and longer periods as the technology improves, and the possibility of after-market batteries and power systems, that frightens the auto manufacturers. They'd much rather lock their customers into dealer service networks with fussy, extremely proprietary fuel cell technology.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Electric Vs Hydrogen: Who...