Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumDid the GOP Just Give Away $130 Billion of Public Property
Did the GOP Just Give Away $130 Billion of Public Property?A giant Anglo-Australian mining company is getting the rights to a huge copper reserve - and we don't know what US taxpayers are getting in return.
In December, two Republican senators, John McCain and Jeff Flake, pushed Congress and the president into giving away what could amount to over $130 billion in public property.
That's enough to provide every single unemployed American a minimum-wage job for an entire year. That's enough to pay for a year of tuition at a public institution for every college student in the US.
And yet the GOP big-shots call themselves "fiscal conservatives"! "Fiscal conservatives," my you-know-what.
I'm talking about the huge giveaway to the mining companies Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton in the Defense Authorization Act. It was splayed across ten pages of the bill, pages 441 to 450 (out of 697).
Much more at link:
http://truth-out.org/news/item/29182-did-the-gop-just-give-away-130-billion-of-public-property
Infuriating! The public comment period of the EIS seems like the main way to exert pressure on this, with letters to Obama & Vilsack also being worthwhile.
-app
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)butterfly77
(17,609 posts)Streets and toll roads to foreign countries All during the Bush years and traded mangoes for nuclear weapons.
quadrature
(2,049 posts)not much royalty
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)Or, that's what people who live near there say. I've never been to that exact location, but oppose public-land giveaways on principle.
-app
quadrature
(2,049 posts)(if I read the story correctly)
as for the land swap,
you would have to look at the
properties involved, to decide
if the deal is fair
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)No doubt it's only pennies or less to the dollar for what our copper is worth, but Republicans are historically quite cheap when one goes to buy them.
jimruymen
(22 posts)for one, we shouldn't be doing this to our land and certainly shouldn't be facilitated by Democrats; oh, I forgot we're about to fast track the TPP
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)You make a good point in bringing up TPP and the other trade agreements moving their way through the system under Obama's supportive watch. The investor-state dispute courts and many other provisions of these 'agreements' (to which I certainly do not agree) will be used to further enclose and appropriate public lands and other resources.
-app
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Dwight42
(43 posts)Well the public got nothing at all, as is so usual in this neo-liberal/conservative political climate but Obama, like Bill Clinton before him will make several hundred millions of dollars on the lecture circuit and speaking engagements over 10 years after leaving office.
Bush on the other hand took most of the Obama administration to be rehabilitated enough, thanks to Obama not arresting him and his administration for war crimes and even socializing with him to go on the lecture circuit and get his percentage for selling out the people of the United States to the corporate world.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Everything they touch leads to death.
valerief
(53,235 posts)that matters--making rich people richer. The rest of us? Let me quote the oligarch with, "Fuck them."
ejbr
(5,856 posts)that they will eventually have the poor pay instead as soon as possible.
fingrin
(120 posts)are parasites. Here in New Zealand they effectively blackmailed the Government for a bail out with the threat of job losses because they were losing money. Surprise, fucking surprise the next year they announced record profits.
quakerboy
(13,920 posts)Im sure they got paid plenty.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)more help than our own American small businesses.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)FBaggins
(26,739 posts)It was in no sense a giveaway of $130 Billion. The author doesn't come close to establihing that value (a property simply isn't worth the current market value of all of an estimated resource that has yet to be recovered and won't begin recovery for a decade).
Nor do I see anything about the (much larger) property that was swapped. The Congressman insinuates that the appraisal will be cooked, but doesn't even give his own estimate of what that other property is worth.
I don't doubt that it's a sweetheart deal... but the author's apparent need to use extreme hyperbole hints it isn't.
OTOH... I think Mr Grayson would use extreme hyperbole if his evening meal included wax beans instead of green.