Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 06:43 AM Feb 2015

The Eiffel Tower now generates its own power with new wind turbines

France's most recognisable landmark, the iron Eiffel Tower erected in 1889, has seen its iconic frame festooned with many different decorations and objects over the years for various celebrations. Its latest addition is a little more subtle -- and maybe a little more in keeping with the tower's original purpose as a monument to human ingenuity and artistry.

turbine2.jpg
Turbine installation.
UGE
As part of a major renovation and upgrade to the tower's first floor, the Société d'Exploitation de la Tour Eiffel will be adding a variety of sustainability features -- the first of which is a pair of VisionAIR5 wind turbines designed by renewable energy specialist Urban Green Energy.

The two vertical-axis turbines have been installed on the tower's second level, about 122 metres (400ft) from the ground -- a position that maximises wind capture. The turbines have been specially painted so as to blend in with the tower, and produce virtually no sound. They can also capture wind from any direction, producing, between them, a total of 10,000kWh per year -- enough to power the tower's first floor.








http://www.cnet.com/news/the-eiffel-tower-now-generates-its-own-power-with-new-wind-turbines/

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Eiffel Tower now generates its own power with new wind turbines (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 OP
K&R. Glad to hear it. Overseas Feb 2015 #1
having been there many times in my life Ichingcarpenter Feb 2015 #2
Great! NV Whino Feb 2015 #3
Kick! CrispyQ Feb 2015 #4
Double that. bvf Feb 2015 #6
Now if we could only do something packman Feb 2015 #5
Pretty Cool! burrowowl Feb 2015 #7
Vive la Paris! silverweb Feb 2015 #8
What is the importance of this? GliderGuider Feb 2015 #9
Possibly that it is an excellent counter-argument to the "renewable energy is ugly" bollocks? Nihil Feb 2015 #10
Yes, it is that. Many wind-power devices are extremely beautiful. GliderGuider Feb 2015 #11
They're beautiful, and blend well with the structure. SunSeeker Feb 2015 #12

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
2. having been there many times in my life
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 10:21 AM
Feb 2015

I was afraid the wind generators would look tacky but they don't

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
5. Now if we could only do something
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 12:54 PM
Feb 2015

with the Washington Monument (solar panels on the sides) or the Statue of Liberty (make that torch really burn something) and what about damming up the Grand Canyon?
USA - USA - USA

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
9. What is the importance of this?
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 05:20 PM
Feb 2015

Seriously, I'm struggling to figure out why everybody is so squee over VAWTs on the Eiffel tower, while world-level serious posts slip by with barely a rec. Surely the board can't be that shallow?

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
10. Possibly that it is an excellent counter-argument to the "renewable energy is ugly" bollocks?
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 06:23 AM
Feb 2015

If the French (a very image- & culture-oriented nation) can find a solution that allows
their most famous landmark to move towards self-powering with renewables then the
old pro-fossil-fuel canard of "But they look all ugly-like" is shot down in flames.

I agree that some really serious posts do slip by with few recs (hell, for some, even
the view count is only in double digits) and I suspect that part of the reason for the
lack of recs on more than a few of them is simply concern exhaustion: the subject has
been shouted about here for literally YEARS with absolutely no progress in the real world.

At times it hits people that just what is the point of recommending the 985th post showing
how the US government is fucking up the ocean for money or how is India burning shit-tons
more coal each year or which toxic compound is currently top of China's atmospheric output
or how many more previously unknown species have gone extinct today or how insulated
from the effects of their exploitation are the 0.1%ers in London/New York/Zurich/Rome
or just how fucking dumb are the voters in Florida or how corrupt is the Harper government
or how many different IDs can a fossil fuel troll have before getting banned again or ... or ...

It is usually the E/E "regulars" (probably the same "double digit viewers" from the above)
that do the initial recs to a post, so, every now & then - when they have seen precisely how
little DUers in general (much less the wider world) actually cares about any of the things that
hit them so hard - there is an unavoidable "Fuck it" moment that means that you realise just
how futile your attempts to rec a repeat of the same critically important issues up for wider
viewing truly are: you are attempting to overpower the overwhelming ignorance, stupidity and
suicidal selfishness that surrounds us with a mouse-click, to claim the attention of couch
potatoes & facebook failures possessing the attention-span of a drunken gnat with a "+1"
to the rec count of something so far down the list of the so-called "Greatest Page" that they'd
never have scrolled down to find it, much preferring to rush off to post more "Awww!!! n/t" replies
to a photo of yet another kitten.

I rec'd this post in the hope that a post having an eye-catching thread title, a simple text
explanation & a few meaningful photos might break through that morass of triviality and put
to rest just one of the many lies about renewable energy that are thrown at us - that it is ugly
and visually damaging. YMMV.





 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
11. Yes, it is that. Many wind-power devices are extremely beautiful.
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 09:52 AM
Feb 2015

A large turbine is a thing of breathtaking grace and power, and these ones fit in so well with the aesthetics of the Eiffel tower that I was astonished. I guess I was just having a bit of a surly day.

I was chatting on FB yesterday about the phenomenon of outrage fatigue, and that many activists seem to be feeling it these days. One can only hear so much evidence of our collective, relentless, unrelieved shuffle towards the cliff-edge before it all becomes too much, and one is forced to withdraw in order to save the remaining shreds of one's sanity and compassion.

I do miss the days when in-depth engagement was the norm on this board, but even I have lost the urge to stir up dissension that once gave me so much malignant glee.

Part of early childhood socialization involves learning how to accommodate the insurmountable frustrations of living in an uncontrollable world. Perhaps this is a continuation of that process. It's easy to see us as powerless, idealistic children facing a world of powerful, pragmatic adults whose desires have nothing to do with our own. For better or worse, we're growing up.

SunSeeker

(51,651 posts)
12. They're beautiful, and blend well with the structure.
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 04:30 PM
Feb 2015

These would look great on any bridge...and top of skyscrapers...and ball field stands...etc.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Eiffel Tower now gene...