Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1732 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ladies and Gentlemen, place your bets! (Original Post)
XemaSab
Mar 2012
OP
I'm with you. Not a huge drop in area, but MASS will continue its free-fall.
Systematic Chaos
Mar 2012
#3
xchrom
(108,903 posts)1. I bet scary levels. Nt
Dead_Parrot
(14,478 posts)2. I'll go for big but thin
13.2M km2, 3.8K km3.
edit: "big" is relative, obviously.
Systematic Chaos
(8,601 posts)3. I'm with you. Not a huge drop in area, but MASS will continue its free-fall.
And pass that ...
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)5. I'm with you fellers
Third or fourth lowest area; lowest volume.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)4. is it that time already?
Continued mass decline is an easy bet. I will be bold and predict a new record area low as well.
OnlinePoker
(5,725 posts)6. I'm an optimist
I say low of 4.2 million sq miles and a volume anomaly based on PIOMAS of about -9000 kilometres cubed (up from about -9700 km3 last year).
?%3C?php%20echo%20time%28%29%20?