Why Can't America Have Great Trains?

[mahatmakanejeeves]

Why Can't America Have Great Trains?

How Washington Derailed Amtrak

A Washington mystery.
By Simon Van Zuylen-Wood
This article appears in the April 18, 2015 edition of National Journal Magazine as Why Can't America Have Great Trains?.

Thirty-nine minutes into his southbound ride from Wilmington, Delaware, to Washington, D.C., Joseph H. Boardman, president and CEO of Amtrak, begins to cry. We're in the dining car of a train called the Silver Star, surrounded by people eating hamburgers. The Silver Star runs from New York City to Miami in 31 hours, or five more hours than the route took in 1958, which is when our dining car was built. Boardman and I have been discussing the unfortunate fact that 45 years since its inception, the company he oversees remains a poorly funded, largely neglected ward of the state, unable to fully control its own finances or make its own decisions. I ask him, "Is this a frustrating job?"

"I guess it could be, and there are times it is," he says. "No question about that. But—" His voice begins to catch. "Sixty-six years old, I've spent my life doing this. I talked to my 80-year-old aunt this weekend, who said, 'Joe, just keep working.' Because I think about retirement." Boardman is a Republican who formerly ran the Federal Railroad Administration and was New York state's transportation commissioner; he has a bushy white mustache and an aw-shucks smile. "We've done good things," he continues. "We haven't done everything right, and I don't make all of the right decisions, and, yes, I get frustrated. But you have to stay up." A tear crawls down his left cheek.

It's easy to love trains—the model kind, the European kind, the kind whose locomotives billow with steam in black-and-white photos of the old American West. It's harder to love Amtrak, the kind we actually ride. Along with PBS and the United States Postal Service, Amtrak is perpetual fodder for libertarian think-tankers and Republican office-seekers on the prowl for government profligacy. Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush repeatedly tried to eliminate its subsidy, while Mitt Romney promised to do the same. Democrats, for their part, aren't interested in slaying Amtrak, but mostly you get the sense they just feel bad for it. "If you ever go to Japan," former Amtrak board member and rail die-hard Mike Dukakis told me, "ride the trains and weep."

(RELATED: 16 Vintage Photos of Amtrak's Early Years)

It's true: Compared with the high-speed trains of Western Europe and East Asia, American passenger rail is notoriously creaky, tardy, and slow. The Acela, currently the only "high-speed" train in America, runs at an average pace of 68 miles per hour between Washington and Boston; a high-speed train from Madrid to Barcelona averages 154 miles per hour. Amtrak's most punctual trains arrive on schedule 75 percent of the time; judged by Amtrak's lax standards, Japan's bullet trains are late basically 0 percent of the time.

[CBGLuthier]

1. Like the inadequate lover the constant refrain is it is too big

Having ridden the fine rails of Italy and Switzerland I weep for such a limited viewpoint.

[katmondoo]

2. I still love trains and the Post Office

Yes I would like to see our trains updated but I won't see it in my lifetime, that is sad. As for the Post Office I won't mail with anyone else. Why people complain I do not Know.

[djean111]

3. Because, as Brad Pitt's movie character says, America is a business, not a country. nt

[MisterP]

4. issues of profitability are almost a sidenote

non-HSR systems, from trolleys and streetcars to fast BART-style local-commuter hybrids, are basically net losses money-wise: of course it's not absolutely big, is FAR less expensive than roads, and is even further less costly than not having transit--pollution, uncontrollable sprawl,

ironically the GOP always complains about the transcons--and then every Senator and Rep in like 24 Rockies and Midwest states starts howling because of how hugely important Amtrak is to their states: they're even clamoring for the Pioneer back

density's not the issue either: you could pave the country with HSR lines from Maine and Florida out to Omaha (except places like KY, TN, and the Upper Peninsula), plus CA, TX, and the Pacific Northwest

Southwest airlines pushed for Texas HSR after destroying it an all-private plan in the 90s, since now flights under 500 miles are unprofitable: counties are having tantrums over a TXHSR plan that's built with 100% private money and that doesn't go through their county at all; so we have the old corporate dominance combined with a new ideological style and GOP structure that rewards people for spraying crazy all over the table

http://grist.org/list/2011-05-05-watch-amtraks-coverage-shrink-over-time/

also in LA's case for local rail we're stuck with Beverly High School spending its earthquake retrofit money on claiming the real danger is the Purple Line, whitebread Cheviot Hills hiring some race-baiting megalomaniac, and Yaroslavsky's pandering: they're NIMFYs, not NIMBYs, since they're against projects that don't even come near them

also, Newsom's now for CAHSR, because the polls moved past the 50% mark