America’s Lethal Profiling of Afghan Men
http://www.alternet.org/world/americas-lethal-profiling-afghan-men
Despite rules of engagement to the contrary, such targeting pervades the entire chain of commandup to the Oval Office.
Americas Lethal Profiling of Afghan Men
By Nick Turse
October 25, 2013
~snip~
On February 21, 2010,
Hellfire missiles from US helicopters streamed down on a convoy filled with militantsmilitary-age males armed with riflesnear Shahidi Hassas, in Afghanistans Uruzgan Province. The band of insurgents was preparing to attack a small US force that was conducting a village raid with Afghan security forces. But the Americans had monitored their cellphone calls and knew all about their plans. A Predator drone had been surveilling their every move for hours and sending video feed to a base in Nevada. Air Force personnel there and at other facilities viewed the footage and helped coordinate the helicopter assault that blasted the caravan before it could attack the Americans.
As many as twenty-seven Taliban were killed in the strike, in addition to the twelve injured. Except they werent Talibanor insurgents of any kind. There was no evidence they had been talking on the phone about attacking the Americans, and they werent converging on the site of the US operation. They werent all military age, and they werent even all men.
After separate investigations, a US Army general and a US Air Force general came to independent conclusions about what led to the attack. The Predator crews faulty communications clouded the picture on adolescents and allowed them to be transformed into military aged males, wrote Air Force Gen. Robert Otto. According to Army Gen. Timothy McHale, The strike occurred because the ground force commander lacked a clear understanding of who was in the vehicles
. The crew of the unmanned Predator aircraft
led [the US troops conducting the village raid] to believe that the vehicles contained only armed military aged males. Both generals blamed US personnel for failing to see that a number of women and children were riding in the convoy.
The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) claims that it has never targeted and killed a military-age male who was later found not to be an insurgent. When asked for clarificationand excepting instances of so-called collateral damagethe command offered further explanation: ISAF forces have not and do not engage individuals because they are of military age, a spokesperson told The Nation. ISAF forces do not engage individuals unless they demonstrate hostile intent or commit a hostile act. However, a review by The Nation of hundreds of pages of investigative documents relating to the Uruzgan attack indicates that civilians were targeted and killed because US military personnel did in fact believe that any military-age male carrying a weapon should be considered a combatant.