Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(126,672 posts)
Fri Feb 27, 2026, 03:01 AM 13 hrs ago

Why 96% of Russians Fall Below the U.S. Poverty Line (Nominal Dollars) - Econ Lessons



Hey Mark, The Economist has another thought experiment on Russian and US economics, focusing on poverty and what the reality is in Russia.

If you apply the official U.S. poverty threshold for a family of four (≈$31,000 per year) to Russia in nominal dollar terms, the overwhelming majority of Russian households would fall below it. Even after adjusting for purchasing power, the share of households living at what would be considered lower-income standards in advanced economies remains substantial.

This video examines:

• The difference between Russia’s official poverty definition and international benchmarks
• Nominal vs. PPP comparisons
• Median income realities outside Moscow and energy centers
• Housing quality, infrastructure gaps, and consumer asset ownership
• Car ownership rates, appliance penetration, and regional disparities
• The structural role of state dominance, limited competition, and weak small-business formation

The central argument is not about starvation-level poverty. It is about **structural stagnation**:

A system where economic mobility is constrained, capital is concentrated, and transparency is limited produces long-term income compression for the majority.

Russia’s economic model remains heavily centralized, with:

• Resource dependence
• State-linked elites controlling key sectors
• Weak institutional safeguards for entrepreneurial expansion

When productivity growth is capped and capital allocation is politically mediated, median living standards plateau.

The result:
• Lower household wealth accumulation
• Thin middle class
• Regional underdevelopment
• Limited upward mobility

This analysis compares data, not rhetoric — examining how economic freedom, institutional transparency, and competitive markets correlate with long-term household prosperity.

Sources include:

• World Bank income and PPP data
• Rosstat income distribution statistics
• OECD household asset comparisons
• U.S. Census poverty guidelines

The question is not whether Russia has poor people. The question is whether the system structurally prevents broad-based prosperity.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Why 96% of Russians Fall ...