Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Mon Sep 15, 2014, 06:04 AM Sep 2014

Top 5 Contradictions in Obama’s Emerging ISIL Strategy

http://www.juancole.com/2014/09/contradictions-emerging-strategy.html

Top 5 Contradictions in Obama’s Emerging ISIL Strategy
By Juan Cole | Sep. 15, 2014

In the past week, Secretary of State John Kerry has marshaled support of some sort from both European nations and from countries in the Middle East for the US push against ISIL. Unfortunately, the resulting coalition is riddled with contradictions that may well cripple it. Here a some of the more important obstacles to a smooth alliance or coherent war plan.

1. Kerry deeply wanted buy-in from Egypt, the most populous Arab state and the most important military power among the Arabs. President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, however, insisted that the strategy be wider-ranging than just a push against ISIL He wanted a campaign against “terrorism” in general. Al-Sisi’s government has declared devotees of political Islam, i.e. the Muslim Brotherhood, to be terrorists. Al-Sisi believes he can “turn” Obama, getting him to stop criticizing Egypt for the overthrow of the Morsi (Muslim Brotherhood) government, and that the US need for him gives him a trump card in this regard.

2. There are hundreds of guerrilla groups fighting in Syria. Some of them have given fealty to the the so-called Islamic State. Others have joined a rival organization that is more Salafi in coloration, the Islamic Front (strong in Aleppo). The National Coalition and the Free Syrian Army are yet another force, heavily dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood and now much weakened. So if Obama agreed with al-Sisi to pursue a global ‘war on terrorism’ together, he would be in the difficult position of opposing the Free Syrian Army and of agreeing to help crush the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood– among the major opposition groups to both ISIL and the Baath regime in Damascus.

3. That is, Obama’s desire to support a “moderate” opposition will lead him to back to the Muslim Brotherhood of Syria. But Saudi Arabia, one of Obama’s major partners, has declared the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, and they have the money to make that stick. With Egypt and Saudi Arabia against the National Coalition and the Free Syrian Army (because of their Muslim Brotherhood ties), Obama by allying with them is basically allying with the murky Islamic Front, which has some al-Qaeda elements and now has turned openly anti-democracy and anti-rights for minorities.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top 5 Contradictions in Obama’s Emerging ISIL Strategy (Original Post) unhappycamper Sep 2014 OP
Maybe we should just stay home for a change newfie11 Sep 2014 #1
With a clear cut battle line like this, it will be no problem for the youth... rgbecker Sep 2014 #2

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
1. Maybe we should just stay home for a change
Mon Sep 15, 2014, 06:12 AM
Sep 2014

Stop supporting fractions worldwide!
What we've been doing hasn't exactly worked out well for us.

rgbecker

(4,832 posts)
2. With a clear cut battle line like this, it will be no problem for the youth...
Mon Sep 15, 2014, 08:16 AM
Sep 2014

of America to step up and join the fight. Volunteers all across America will be flooding the recruiting stations of the Army, Airforce, Navy and Marines. This is clearly a fight congress will grasp as we enter the 2016 election season.

CHARGE! KILL THE TERRORISTS! ALL OF THEM! LEAD THE WAY!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Top 5 Contradictions in O...