Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 10:45 AM Feb 2015

Once a top booster, ex-U.S. envoy (Robert Ford) no longer backs arming Syrian rebels

ASHINGTON — Robert Ford was always one of the Syrian rebels’ loudest cheerleaders in Washington, agitating from within a reluctant administration to arm vetted moderates to fight Bashar Assad’s brutal regime.

In recent weeks, however, Ford, the former U.S. ambassador to Syria who made news when he left government service a year ago with an angry critique of Obama administration policy, has dropped his call to provide weapons to the rebels. Instead, he’s become increasingly critical of them as disjointed and untrustworthy because they collaborate with jihadists.

...

Ford said the time had come for U.S. officials and their allies to have a serious talk about “boots on the ground,” though he was quick to add that the fighters didn’t need to be American. He said a professional ground force was the only way to wrest Syria from the jihadists.

And any parallel effort to build up a local rebel movement would have to be streamlined through a central, Syrian chain of command, he said. International partners, Ford said, have to ditch the current “nonsensical” framework in which regional powerhouses each fund client groups in an uncoordinated tangle that he said would be comical if the results weren’t so tragic.

http://www.thestate.com/2015/02/18/3995633_once-a-top-booster-ex-us-envoy.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Once a top booster, ex-U.S. envoy (Robert Ford) no longer backs arming Syrian rebels (Original Post) jakeXT Feb 2015 OP
Yeah, fuck, let's occupy Syria. bemildred Feb 2015 #1
As if US boots on the ground will be any less tragic. Spare us from neocons in the State Dept. leveymg Feb 2015 #2
Look, Charlie Rose is tweeting a poll where 57% support ground troops jakeXT Feb 2015 #4
Oh sure. "Never mind, bad idea. Why did you listen to me?" TwilightGardener Feb 2015 #3
The Ming Emperors executed failed war ministers and generals who misled campaigns leveymg Feb 2015 #5
Might be time to revive that tradition, LOL. TwilightGardener Feb 2015 #6

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
2. As if US boots on the ground will be any less tragic. Spare us from neocons in the State Dept.
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 12:01 PM
Feb 2015

Escalation - It's what "serious people" in Washington do when previous policy fails.

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
4. Look, Charlie Rose is tweeting a poll where 57% support ground troops
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 06:48 PM
Feb 2015

CBS News Poll: For the first time, a majority of Americans (57%) favor the use of U.S. ground troops in the fight against ISIS.

https://mobile.twitter.com/charlierose/status/568383021835014144

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
3. Oh sure. "Never mind, bad idea. Why did you listen to me?"
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 12:55 PM
Feb 2015

None of these assclowns know anything. They just lurch from theory to theory, and when it turns to shit, they move on to the next big idea.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Once a top booster, ex-U....