Foreign Affairs
Related: About this forumOnce a top booster, ex-U.S. envoy (Robert Ford) no longer backs arming Syrian rebels
ASHINGTON Robert Ford was always one of the Syrian rebels loudest cheerleaders in Washington, agitating from within a reluctant administration to arm vetted moderates to fight Bashar Assads brutal regime.
In recent weeks, however, Ford, the former U.S. ambassador to Syria who made news when he left government service a year ago with an angry critique of Obama administration policy, has dropped his call to provide weapons to the rebels. Instead, hes become increasingly critical of them as disjointed and untrustworthy because they collaborate with jihadists.
...
Ford said the time had come for U.S. officials and their allies to have a serious talk about boots on the ground, though he was quick to add that the fighters didnt need to be American. He said a professional ground force was the only way to wrest Syria from the jihadists.
And any parallel effort to build up a local rebel movement would have to be streamlined through a central, Syrian chain of command, he said. International partners, Ford said, have to ditch the current nonsensical framework in which regional powerhouses each fund client groups in an uncoordinated tangle that he said would be comical if the results werent so tragic.
http://www.thestate.com/2015/02/18/3995633_once-a-top-booster-ex-us-envoy.html
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Dumb ass.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Escalation - It's what "serious people" in Washington do when previous policy fails.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)CBS News Poll: For the first time, a majority of Americans (57%) favor the use of U.S. ground troops in the fight against ISIS.
https://mobile.twitter.com/charlierose/status/568383021835014144
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)None of these assclowns know anything. They just lurch from theory to theory, and when it turns to shit, they move on to the next big idea.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)A certainty of accountability might be more effective at curbing the enthusiasms of those who lurch from military failure to failure. See, https://books.google.com/books?id=IWS53cuiuVgC&pg=PA247&lpg=PA247&dq=executed+failed+generals&source=bl&ots=glP9M-C-f9&sig=iWYIofIvwm-W2E0otQVyFYCj6WQ&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ik3nVN_EKKiasQThiYGoAQ&ved=0CFwQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=executed%20failed%20generals&f=false