Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumAt the UN on Nakba 77 Rabbi Challenges Zionist Narratives
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Lithos (a host of the Israel/Palestine group).
Jun 5, 2025
At the United Nations on Nakba 77, May 15, 2025, Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss speaking on the world's silence on the genocide in Gaza, exposing Zionist lies and rejecting the false accusations of antisemitism used to stifle criticism of Israel.

creon
(1,658 posts)Neither Party is innocent.
Both are victims
Both are perpetrators
brush
(60,320 posts)the ethnic cleansing, killing and starvation of Palestinians.
creon
(1,658 posts)thay applies to both sides
brush
(60,320 posts)clear Palestinians out of Gaza. The world is watching.
creon
(1,658 posts)Hamas does not have the means. If they had the means, they would do the same.
Beastly Boy
(12,784 posts)There are 3,000 Jews left in North African countries out of 500,000 in 1948.
400 Jews out of 300,000 in the Muslim Middle East.
24000 out of 150,000 in the non-Arab Muslim countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_the_Muslim_world
Yes, ethnic cleansing. Yes, genocide. And no, not peaceful.
al bupp
(2,467 posts)There were a number of factors that contributed to the exodus. From the source you provided,
Nevertheless, I notice that you do not attempt to argue on the merits of the Rabbi's assertion that anti-Zionism should not equate to antisemitism.
Beastly Boy
(12,784 posts)But if you pay attention to the rest of the article, much of the Jewish exodus was triggered by extreme violence, official acts against the local Jewish populations, and outright expulsions from their homes where they lived for centuries.
I am not in a habit of arguing with extremist religious nutcases, so you shouldn't be surprised with me declining that honor. However, since you found merit in the Rabbi's argument, I will respond to you: in the same way that anti-Zionism should not equate to antisemitism, antisemitism should not mask itself as anti-Zionism.
It takes some homework, but it is easy enough to distinguish between antisemitism and anti-Zionism. First, one should take time to learn what Zionism is. If one is ignorant on the subject and calls oneself an anti-Zionist, the conversation ends right there: being anti-something without the basic knowledge of what that something is betrays an argument out of ignorance. Learning about Zionism also helps articulate what specific aspects of Zionism one is "anti-".
Second, one should take time to learn what antisemitism is. In addition to overt anti-Jew hatred, there is a whole category of more covert antisemitic sentiments. There is a large collection of baseless sentiments associated with antisemitism. They are called antisemitic tropes, and they have been used time and again to level unfounded accusations against Jews (BTW, accusations of genocide and ethnic cleansing are nothing new - they have been sporadically leveled against Jews for centuries, way before Gaza)
So here is how to tell the two apart: first, look for hyperbole in describing grievances. It is not antisemitic in itself, but it raises suspicions of an argument being non-factual. Then, look for bias. If the standards for anti-Zionist criticism is applied capriciously towards Zionists and no one else under comparable circumstances, it's a dead giveaway that there is more to it than legitimate criticism. Finally, look for references to antisemitic tropes. If there are accusations resembling them, there is no question: that's antisemitism.
Beastly Boy
(12,784 posts)This Rabbi os from Neturei Karta, the most right wing religious zealot cult around. Smotrich and Gvir, and American Evangelicals are downright commies compared to these guys. They are waiting for the Messiah to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem
Think the Taliban on steroids.
Uncle Joe
(62,040 posts)If he's right wing, what does that make Netanyahu?
Beastly Boy
(12,784 posts)They are arguing their dogma, nothing else. They are not arguing for the Palestinians, they are arguing against a secular Jewish state. They were arguing against it before the partition of Palestine, they were arguing against it after. They were arguing against it before 1967, they were arguing against it after. They were arguing against it before "genocide" and "starvation" became an argument, and, they are still arguing against it. They will co-opt whatever fits their dogma.
Uncle Joe
(62,040 posts)because he doesn't sound right wing.
Beastly Boy
(12,784 posts)Uncle Joe
(62,040 posts)even Tucker Carlson came off like a flaming liberal when he interviewed Ted Cruz.
Beastly Boy
(12,784 posts)I am surprised people still fall for this.
Uncle Joe
(62,040 posts)"I am surprised people still fall for this."
Beastly Boy
(12,784 posts)Doesn't take a rocket surgeon to be one.
Uncle Joe
(62,040 posts)people, he left "attention whore" in the rear view mirror.
Beastly Boy
(12,784 posts)And an attention whore. The two are not irreconcilable.
Lithos
(26,546 posts)Please note this is not a news or op-ed article.
Lithos