Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 05:53 AM Jul 2014

Israel accepts truce plan; Hamas balks

GAZA CITY — Israel on Tuesday accepted an Egyptian proposal for a cease-fire with Hamas in Gaza after a week of non-stop fire, but the Islamist militant group rejected the deal, saying it had not been consulted on its terms.

A senior Hamas official, Sami Abu Zuhri, called the proposal “unacceptable” and complained that Egyptians have not spoken with the Gaza leadership. The group’s armed wing, the Qassam Brigade, wrote on its Web site that the initiative was “not worth the ink it was written with” and “the resistance will continue until all the demands of our people are met.”

Israel reported several rockets launched over southern Israel just after 10 a.m. Sirens were going off in southern Israeli communities and in Sderot, indicating more rocket fire. A salvo of five rockets were seen launching from the center of Gaza at 11:15 a.m. Israel Defense Forces spokesman Lt. Col. Peter Lerner said the Israeli military was holding fire at the direction of the government, but will respond if Hamas and its allies continue to launch rockets.

In a televised press conference together with the German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv on Tuesday morning, Netanyahu said that “If Hamas rejects the Egyptian proposal and the rocket fire continues, which it looks like it does at the moment, then we are prepared to continue and intensify the operation against Hamas and we will get the support from the members of the international community.”


http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/israel-accepts-truce-plan-hamas-balks/2014/07/15/04373008-0bf5-11e4-8c9a-923ecc0c7d23_story.html


For days there have been non-stop complaining about Palestinian casualties. So where are the cries from pro-Palestinians NOW for Hamas to stop firing rockets at Israel so all this can end?

Why the silence? Shouldn't there be worldwide outcry calling on Hamas to end their senseless and counterproductive attacks? If all these people who purport to care for Palestinians actually cared, they'd be begging Hamas to stop.

Where are they?
52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Israel accepts truce plan; Hamas balks (Original Post) shira Jul 2014 OP
I wonder how the usual suspects will blame this on Israel. NaturalHigh Jul 2014 #1
Shamelessly and self-righteously. Fozzledick Jul 2014 #6
you had to ask, didn't you? read this crap... shira Jul 2014 #7
ceasefire, not truce shaayecanaan Jul 2014 #2
Yep , Egypt designed it that way, King_David Jul 2014 #3
they're rooted either way to be honest shaayecanaan Jul 2014 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author cerveza_gratis Jul 2014 #47
Yes shaayecanaan Jul 2014 #50
so are you saying Egypt purposely designed a 'cease fire' they suspected would be rejected by Hamas? azurnoir Jul 2014 #10
Hamas doesn't want to stop. Doesn't want a cease fire. Rejected a cease fire. King_David Jul 2014 #12
well thanks and all but that really doesn't answer what I asked azurnoir Jul 2014 #13
Hamas is demanding to be REWARDED for starting a war and getting Palestinians killed. Fozzledick Jul 2014 #14
so ending the seige would not lead to peace in your mind? azurnoir Jul 2014 #15
Ending the siege without a real peace settlement would just lead to more rocket attacks. Fozzledick Jul 2014 #16
would it now? again has keeping the siege intact lead to peace? n/t azurnoir Jul 2014 #17
It's led to a reduction in Hamas' offensive capabilities. Fozzledick Jul 2014 #18
I' m asking you questions and have twice now gotten accusations as part of your reply azurnoir Jul 2014 #19
Oh, I'm sorry. I thought your words had actual linguistic meaning. Fozzledick Jul 2014 #20
let's take a look at Israel's major military operation in Gaza since 2006 there have been 6 of them azurnoir Jul 2014 #21
Those Dates 4Q2u2 Jul 2014 #27
there have been rocket attacks and bombing reprisals from Israel on an ongoing basis azurnoir Jul 2014 #28
It is all Israel thinks it has 4Q2u2 Jul 2014 #31
try this azurnoir Jul 2014 #32
Bottom line Hamas rejected out of hand Egypt's cease fire proposal King_David Jul 2014 #22
yes Hamas rejected it and Israel accepted it in that order azurnoir Jul 2014 #26
And that makes a difference ? King_David Jul 2014 #29
well it certainly made the outcome of Israels vote really neither here nor there didn't it? azurnoir Jul 2014 #30
And that makes a difference because... King_David Jul 2014 #33
I think you made the point for me - thanks azurnoir Jul 2014 #36
I agree King_David Jul 2014 #37
except as we shall review Hamas rejected and after that Israel accepted azurnoir Jul 2014 #38
Hamas rejected this cease fire King_David Jul 2014 #39
Tell us do you think Israel felt it's acceptance would stop the bloodshed? azurnoir Jul 2014 #40
Israel accepted it , King_David Jul 2014 #41
except as we will once again review Hamas had already rejected it at the time Israel accepted it azurnoir Jul 2014 #42
Anyone beside you think any of that is relevant ? King_David Jul 2014 #45
Anybody else beside you think that timelines important ? King_David Jul 2014 #43
do any of them post here? n/t azurnoir Jul 2014 #44
Ahh a personal theory King_David Jul 2014 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author cerveza_gratis Jul 2014 #5
Ali Abunimah retweets death better than ceasefire shira Jul 2014 #8
True colors .. King_David Jul 2014 #23
He doesn't mean his own death, King_David Jul 2014 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author cerveza_gratis Jul 2014 #51
Mondoweiss shills for Hamas: "Understanding Hamas" shira Jul 2014 #9
Mondoweiss ? King_David Jul 2014 #24
They're taken seriously here on this forum.... shira Jul 2014 #25
Hamas shill Alex Kane (Mondoweiss) rejects ceasefire shira Jul 2014 #11
The White dude wannabe leaders of the Palestinian people telling them to fight on . King_David Jul 2014 #34
Phonies @ Jewish Voice for Peace blast ceasefire too... shira Jul 2014 #48
BDS co-founder Omar Barghouti rejects ceasefire, sides w/ Hamas shira Jul 2014 #49
Richard Silverstein not only rejects ceasefire.... shira Jul 2014 #52
 

shira

(30,109 posts)
7. you had to ask, didn't you? read this crap...
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 12:24 PM
Jul 2014

Radical leftwing Hamas apologists at +972 reject ceasefire. Apparently there hasn't been enough bloodshed yet...

http://972mag.com/what-does-israeli-acceptance-of-ceasefire-really-mean/93642/

The assholes at Mondoweiss and ElectronicIntifada are citing this trash, as they reject the ceasefire too.

shaayecanaan

(6,068 posts)
2. ceasefire, not truce
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 07:19 AM
Jul 2014

According to al Jazeera hamas want a complete truce, no more arrests, no more assassinations in the west bank and no more air strikes for no more rockets.

Israel is only wanting to grant a bare ceasefire at this stage.

shaayecanaan

(6,068 posts)
4. they're rooted either way to be honest
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 07:40 AM
Jul 2014

Hopefully the reconciliation can proceed after this is all finished and Gaza can begin to build again.

Response to shaayecanaan (Reply #4)

shaayecanaan

(6,068 posts)
50. Yes
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 11:26 PM
Jul 2014

Other terms are knackered, buggered, stuffed. All of them are broadly equivalent to screwed, or fucked.

To have a root is to have a shag, a grind, a fuck. Ergo, you do not want to ask someone outside the US the name of the sports team for which they "root".

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
10. so are you saying Egypt purposely designed a 'cease fire' they suspected would be rejected by Hamas?
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 01:26 PM
Jul 2014

doesn't seem much like an honest broker to me, and sort of reduces the whole thing to what is called 'political theater', something that is very out of place in this situation

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
13. well thanks and all but that really doesn't answer what I asked
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 01:44 PM
Jul 2014

Hamas did lay out what it found acceptable

The proposed truce would start on Tuesday morning, and be followed by talks on a long-term ceasefire.

Khaled al-Batch, a senior leader of the Islamic Jihad armed group, said that the group welcomed "Egypt's role and efforts to end the Israeli aggression and defend the Palestinian people" but will not accept the ceasefire without conditions.

"It is not acceptable to start observing a ceasefire for short term then negotiate the terms. We have experienced this in the past and it has failed," he said.

"What is needed now is to agree on the demands of the Palestinian people, chiefly ending the siege and opening the border corsing, then a zero hour can be agreed upon. Otherwise, history will repeat itself, period."

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/07/hamas-rejects-egypt-ceasefire-plan-gaza-201471543638311569.html

Fozzledick

(3,860 posts)
14. Hamas is demanding to be REWARDED for starting a war and getting Palestinians killed.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 01:55 PM
Jul 2014

They're making extortionate demands not just on Israel but also on EGYPT for a temporary cease fire that would allow them to rearm and start over again, and rejecting any conditions that might lead to a real peace.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
15. so ending the seige would not lead to peace in your mind?
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 01:56 PM
Jul 2014

is that because keeping it in place has or what?

Fozzledick

(3,860 posts)
16. Ending the siege without a real peace settlement would just lead to more rocket attacks.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 02:05 PM
Jul 2014

But you already know that.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
19. I' m asking you questions and have twice now gotten accusations as part of your reply
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 02:18 PM
Jul 2014

I am not arguing for or against Hamas capabilities and how could I know what has not been tried

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
21. let's take a look at Israel's major military operation in Gaza since 2006 there have been 6 of them
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 02:27 PM
Jul 2014

June 2014 – Protective Edge

November 2012 – Pillar of Defense

December 2008 – Cast Lead

February 2008 – Hot Winter

June 2006 – Summer Rains

February 2006 – Lightning Strike

http://972mag.com/the-unfolding-lie-of-operation-protective-edge/93605/

have any of these brought peace?

 

4Q2u2

(1,406 posts)
27. Those Dates
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:21 PM
Jul 2014

Magically coincide with rocket attacks from outside of Israel.
So were those operations responses or offensive?

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
28. there have been rocket attacks and bombing reprisals from Israel on an ongoing basis
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:27 PM
Jul 2014

these were major military operations all of which claimed to be sort of the "war to end all wars" sort of thing has that tactic worked?

 

4Q2u2

(1,406 posts)
31. It is all Israel thinks it has
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:32 PM
Jul 2014

It's blockade is less violent but it was hammered for that tactic. It's Berlin Wall is supposed to be a non violent security measure, there were hammered for that. Hamas is not just going to stop until there is no Israel. They are barely welcome to the 2 State Solution. Flowers in their guns are not going to work.
I am open to your suggestions. I would like to know what alternatives are out there.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
32. try this
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:48 PM
Jul 2014

The unfolding lie of Operation Protective Edge

An Israeli leadership truly interested in a peace agreement would not have driven its partner to the point of lacking any leadership authority among his people. But that is exactly the point. Israel is not really interested in peace or in a partner who can bring about peace.

http://972mag.com/the-unfolding-lie-of-operation-protective-edge/93605/

King_David

(14,851 posts)
22. Bottom line Hamas rejected out of hand Egypt's cease fire proposal
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:03 PM
Jul 2014

Israel immediately accepted it .

Hamas fucked up before , during , and now.

How on earth can anyone believe they will be allowed to stay in the Palestinian government ?

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
26. yes Hamas rejected it and Israel accepted it in that order
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:08 PM
Jul 2014

making Hamas rather foolish and Israel's acceptance sort of meaningless in a real world way

the time stamps on these 2 threads show that

8:49 7/14 Hamas rejects

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1134&pid=68951

2:48 am 7/15 Israel accepts

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014846473

King_David

(14,851 posts)
29. And that makes a difference ?
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:28 PM
Jul 2014

Israel's cabinet had to vote.
Terrorists rejected it immediately without even thinking . They don't really care - it is as it seems .

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
30. well it certainly made the outcome of Israels vote really neither here nor there didn't it?
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:31 PM
Jul 2014

as Israel already knew accepting the cease fire would amount to nothing in the reality on the ground

King_David

(14,851 posts)
33. And that makes a difference because...
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:53 PM
Jul 2014

Israel accepted the cease fire, Hamas as expected rejected it .
The coming deaths and bloodshed is on Hamas . As usual.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
38. except as we shall review Hamas rejected and after that Israel accepted
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 04:16 PM
Jul 2014

makes a bit of a difference Israel's acceptance has made for a good show though

8:49 7/14 Hamas rejects

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1134&pid=68951

2:48 am 7/15 Israel accepts

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014846473

King_David

(14,851 posts)
39. Hamas rejected this cease fire
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 04:20 PM
Jul 2014

And so the bloodshed continues.

Imagine how many lives would of been spared had Hamas accepted the Egyptian cease fire as Israel has?

Unfortunately no surprise .

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
40. Tell us do you think Israel felt it's acceptance would stop the bloodshed?
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 04:24 PM
Jul 2014

considering Hamas had already rejected the cease fire?

King_David

(14,851 posts)
41. Israel accepted it ,
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 04:26 PM
Jul 2014

Had Hamas accepted it bloodshed would of stopped.

Hamas doesn't even need a formal cease fire --- if Hamas stops firing rockets Today-- the bloodshed stops.

Not in Hamas best interest to stop the bloodshed-

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
42. except as we will once again review Hamas had already rejected it at the time Israel accepted it
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 04:29 PM
Jul 2014

8:49 7/14 Hamas rejects

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1134&pid=68951

2:48 am 7/15 Israel accepts

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014846473

if indeed Hamas had not yet spoken it would be different

King_David

(14,851 posts)
45. Anyone beside you think any of that is relevant ?
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 04:32 PM
Jul 2014

Kerry ? Abbas ?
Cameron ?
The people of Gaza?
A blogger or tweeter somewhere ?

King_David

(14,851 posts)
43. Anybody else beside you think that timelines important ?
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 04:31 PM
Jul 2014

Kerry ?Abbas? Gazan People ?
A blogger somewhere?

Response to shira (Original post)

King_David

(14,851 posts)
35. He doesn't mean his own death,
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 04:05 PM
Jul 2014

He's bravely telling the Gazans their death is better than a cease fire.

Response to King_David (Reply #35)

King_David

(14,851 posts)
24. Mondoweiss ?
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 03:06 PM
Jul 2014

Who cares how you spell irrelevant.. May as well have been silver berg or Sdilverstein or scgnederstein or whatever his name is.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
34. The White dude wannabe leaders of the Palestinian people telling them to fight on .
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 04:04 PM
Jul 2014

Of course it's not his blood or families dying because Hamas is hiding among them..

He's not even Palestinian .

My bet is most Gazans would of voted for a cease fire.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
49. BDS co-founder Omar Barghouti rejects ceasefire, sides w/ Hamas
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 09:39 PM
Jul 2014

Last edited Wed Nov 12, 2014, 10:42 PM - Edit history (2)

http://www.odsg.org/co/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3087:palestinians-totally-united-in-rejecting-egypts-pro-israel-proposal-for-ceasefire&catid=31:general&Itemid=41

NEW DELHI: The Palestinians have rejected the Egyptian proposal fr a ceasefire. The opposition is not restricted to Hamas that has of course made the first categorical announcement but to all shades of Palestinian opinion that feel it calls for “complete surrender of the Palestinian resistance.

Omar Barghouti who is a human rights activist the founding committee member of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions Campaign against Israel told The Citizen from Ramallah that, “the so called Egyptian proposal, which is clearly a US-Israeli proposal with Egyptian packaging, reflects Israel’s predicament in its current bloody aggression on the besieged and occupied Gaza strip. The proposal is largely seen by Palestinian society as a lifeline thrown to save Israel after its failure to achieve any of its declared political objectives from the assault.”

Israel instead has lost public opinion across the world with massive demonstrations on its attack on innocent Palestinians reported from across the globe. As Barghouti said, “Israel’s current massacre in Gaza is premeditated, calculated and accurately executed to mete out severe pain on the 1.7 million Palestinians who live in that huge prison camp. That is not surprising, given Israel’s record of state terrorism.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Israel accepts truce plan...