Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumA Dose of Nuance: Can we please stop talking about ‘hasbara’?
....But the next time someone asks me that question, Im going to change my answer. No longer am I going to recount the history of when Israel apparently stopped investing as heavily in hasbara, and no longer am I going to try to explain that our story is a complex one, not readily reduced to sound bites. Instead, Im going to remind the questioner of whats happening in Israel, and why, no matter what we do, hasbara is essentially useless and hopeless. It is so utterly useless, in fact, that I think we just ought to drop the concept and the term. The notion behind hasbara is that if you only tell your story in a sufficiently compelling and powerful way, some people will get it, and Israel will no longer be tied to the proverbial whipping post of the international media.
But after what happened on October 22, does anyone still believe that? As is well-known, a Palestinian driver with a terrorist background (he had spent time in Israeli jail for terrorism, and was a family relation of a former head of Hamass military wing) plowed into a group of innocent pedestrians at a light rail stop, killing two people (a baby, Chaya Zissel Braun, who died just hours later, and 22-year-old Karen Yemima Mosquera, who succumbed to her wounds after several days) and wounding six others. When the driver tried to escape, he was shot and killed by police.
A horrible story, but a simple one.
Yet how did the international media report it? The initial AP headline, changed following an outcry, was Israeli police shoot man in east Jerusalem. Yes, you read that correctly. As far as the headline was concerned, the story was that Israeli police shot a guy. That he had tried to kill people, that he had intentionally run them over and wounded several of them grievously, that he was a known terrorist all that was apparently irrelevant to the headline. All the initial AP headline chose to note was that those Israelis had shot another Palestinian.
more...
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/A-Dose-of-Nuance-Can-we-please-stop-talking-about-hasbara-381004
shira
(30,109 posts)Tell me what good would hasbara have done? The AP eventually relented and revised their headline (amazingly, though, the URL of their post news.yahoo.com/ israeli-police-shoot-man-east-jerusalem- 153643679.html retained the original headline for a while, even after they revised the text), but Ken Roth, the executive director of Human Rights Watch (so hostile to Israel that even its founder, Robert Bernstein, ended up repudiating the very organization he had founded), has not relented. Immediately after the attack, he tweeted: Palestinian deadly crash into train stop. Israel calls it terrorist attack... typical of Hamas. Note the implication behind Roths language: Was it a terrorist attack? Well, the Israelis say so.
Days later, when the second victim died, Roth continued in his stance: Second fatality from Palestinian who drove car into Jerusalem train stop. Police treating it as purposeful attack. Those Israelis, again... treating it as a purposeful attack. What would Mr.Roth call it? Does anyone imagine that any hasbara would have influenced Roths poisonous hatred for Israel? When Karen Yemima Mosquera was buried, The Guardian headline read: Jerusalem car crash funerals held.
Car crash? And underlining the headline, The Guardian notes that she was killed when a car driven by a Palestinian man veered onto a Jerusalem pavement crowded with pedestrians. What good would hasbara have done? A memo from the US Consulate in Jerusalem (the consulate has since removed the memo from its website) referred to the attack as a traffic incident.
Would hasbara have changed that? Lets not kid ourselves. Israel makes plenty of mistakes and does many foolish things just like any other country. But it is also viciously pilloried in the international press, as the response to last weeks horrific events make clear.
The problem is not with how Israel tells the story, but with how the Western world has grown tired of Israel. There are many reasons for this, but hasbara is not the answer.
No one has explained this phenomenon better than award-winning Israeli journalist Matti Friedman.
You dont need to be a history professor, or a psychiatrist, to understand whats going on. Having rehabilitated themselves against considerable odds in a minute corner of the earth, the descendants of powerless people who were pushed out of Europe and the Islamic Middle East have become what their grandparents were the pool into which the world spits.
Precisely. And would hasbara even the best we might imagine have any impact on that? Obviously not. So can we please not talk about hasbara anymore? Lets stop asking why the Israeli government is so incompetent at telling its story, and focus on the question that matters.
Lets start asking instead: Why has the international communitys moral compass become so utterly dysfunctional?