Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

William769

(55,147 posts)
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 06:43 PM Jan 2013

Cash Flow Drying Up for Antigay Prop. 8 Supporters

Last edited Thu Jan 31, 2013, 09:10 PM - Edit history (1)

For the third year in a row, the antigay group defending California's Proposition 8 in court failed to raise more money than it spent, according to tax documents reviewed by Reuters.

ProtectMarriage.com, which stepped in to defend the voter-approved ban on marriage equality in court after California's governor refused to do so, showed a $2 million deficit in its legal fund at the end of 2011, reports Reuters. The organization says it has since recovered the shortfall, but an attorney for the group told Reuters that ProtectMarriage.com is still $70,000 short on its fundraising for Supreme Court costs.

In late March, the Supreme Court will hear arguments on the Prop. 8 case, known as Hollingsworth v. Perry. The defendant-intervenors, ProtectMarriage.com, hope to reconcile their funding shortfall before that date, and sent an email to supporters asking for increased donations.

"Unless the pace of donations starts to pick up right away, we could soon be forced over a financial cliff," said the email, sent earlier this month.

http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2013/01/31/cash-flow-drying-antigay-prop-8-supporters

What a shame.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cash Flow Drying Up for Antigay Prop. 8 Supporters (Original Post) William769 Jan 2013 OP
Protect whose marriage? And from what? shenmue Jan 2013 #1
Bigots, meet cliff. Starry Messenger Jan 2013 #2
According to the Attorney SCOTUS Hired the House Legal Committee Doesn't Have Standing dballance Jan 2013 #3
And may I be the first to say: Initech Feb 2013 #4

shenmue

(38,506 posts)
1. Protect whose marriage? And from what?
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 06:46 PM
Jan 2013

Apparently the marriages of homophobes are so shaky, they'll be destroyed if a gay couple wants to live and be happy together.

Eh, some folks need to calm down.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
2. Bigots, meet cliff.
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 07:08 PM
Jan 2013

I will never forgive them for their firehose of money into CA in 2008. They're worse than the Mob.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
3. According to the Attorney SCOTUS Hired the House Legal Committee Doesn't Have Standing
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 07:17 PM
Jan 2013

in the DOMA case because they're not the administration and they don't represent the entire congress.

If that is correct then wouldn't that mean this citizen's group doesn't have standing in the Prop 8 case because it's not the CA Attorney General? It's not even part of the legislature or government in any manner.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»Cash Flow Drying Up for A...