LGBT
Related: About this forumInteresting interview with psychologist Karen Franklin about gay bashing
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/assault/interviews/franklin.htmlcate94
(2,810 posts)and frightening.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)... but I found this portion particularly -- and can't quite find the right word -- distressing.
When you conducted your studies around the Bay area, did you find the sense that gays made socially acceptable targets?
I did. That was interesting, because the Bay area is a very progressive, liberal area, and I found strong endorsement for gay civil rights among my survey respondents. But I still found an overwhelming amount of anti-gay behaviors. Name-calling is especially very ubiquitous. About 70 percent of respondents said that their male friends had done name-calling. So, everybody knew people who targeted gays for at least name-calling, if not more physical acts. And again, it's not so much that the individuals harbor hatred and resentment. It's more that there's a cultural backdrop in which it's really permissible, if not very cool, to assault or harass gays. . . . One out of ten of the college students--and this is a non-criminal young adult population--said that they had either threatened or actually physically assaulted somebody they thought was a gay man or a lesbian.
One out of ten?
One out of ten. And another 24 percent reported name-calling. So more than a third reported some type of anti-gay behavior. I had no idea that was going to be that high. Among male respondents, it was even higher, about 50 percent. So, about half.
"...really permissible, if not very cool, to assault or harass gays.."
Honestly, it sickens me.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)I tend to think the majority are very unsure of sexuality in general, and theirs in particular, and the defense mechansim is to name call, but claim it's only joking around.