Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What the fuck is this shit? (Original Post) Aerows Aug 2013 OP
I think you are wrong. I think they are being sarcastic and making fun of something someone said Th1onein Aug 2013 #1
I bloomin' hope so Aerows Aug 2013 #2
That's how I read it, too. TDale313 Aug 2013 #5
Somebody needed the "sarcasm" smilie Warpy Aug 2013 #3
The phrase makes no sense in the context of the post enlightenment Aug 2013 #4
Aerows got it wrong. Aerows Aug 2013 #6
you're reading it wrong Skittles Aug 2013 #7
To me it sounds like Fearless Aug 2013 #8
I think it's sarcasm MNBrewer Aug 2013 #9
It's an attempt at satire mwrguy Aug 2013 #10

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
1. I think you are wrong. I think they are being sarcastic and making fun of something someone said
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 10:46 PM
Aug 2013

about the NSA scandal.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
2. I bloomin' hope so
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 10:49 PM
Aug 2013

I may have given in to a hair trigger after all of this going on. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and I admit it.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
5. That's how I read it, too.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 10:58 PM
Aug 2013

I think it was satirizing the some of the personal attacks on Snowden and Glenn Greenwald.

On a side/related question: am I overreacting/misreading in sensing a homophobic undertone when people (mostly detractors) go for the "cutesy" GG/Gigi nickname?

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
4. The phrase makes no sense in the context of the post
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 10:51 PM
Aug 2013

so I'm going to assume the poster meant to write "this poster's (i.e., the OP) first defense" rather than "the poster".

It might have been deliberate, though - to deflect a charge of "personal attack" on the OP and getting hidden for that reason.

The post itself reads as a defense of Greenwald and his partner, Aerows. I think you are reading it wrong.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
6. Aerows got it wrong.
Mon Aug 19, 2013, 11:03 PM
Aug 2013

Damn, I guess I'll have to try harder to improve my track record of "Aerows get's it right". Thanks all. I'm actually pleased to be wrong.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
8. To me it sounds like
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:43 AM
Aug 2013

The Fox News version of telling the news by saying "sources say" something. This method is used to suggest an agenda by trying to legitimize it by saying someone else suggests it's true. The poster is claiming that progressives say... that we should demonize Greenwald for being gay. Of course, that's fucking stupid.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
9. I think it's sarcasm
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 01:45 AM
Aug 2013

Could also have said "the standard DUer response would be..." and had the same meaning, given the homophobia rampant here in this den of "progressivism".

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»LGBT»What the fuck is this shi...