Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumToday in 1915: NYC Suffrage Parade Expected to Include 45K+ Supporters
Today in 1915: NYC Suffrage Parade Expected to Include 45K+ Supporters
October 22, 1915: The rapidly rising tide of support for woman suffrage will make tomorrows parade down New Yorks Fifth Avenue even more spectacular than any before it if most of the 47,230 people who have signed pledges to march take part. That stunning number was released today by organizers, and it means that the incredible growth of suffrage parades continues.
On February 16, 1908, it was big news when about two dozen members of the Progressive Woman Suffrage Union defied propriety and police by marching down Broadway in the citys first unofficial suffrage parade. Two years later, Harriot Stanton Blatch, head of what was then called the Equality League of Self-Supporting Women, called for another march, despite the opposition of conservative suffragists who warned that such a spectacle would set suffrage back 50 years. This time 400 women, carrying numerous banners, were applauded by several thousand spectators.
The 1910 event generated such huge amounts of favorable publicity that it was decided to have such a march every year, and soon even those who had been the most skeptical in the beginning were now taking part. In 1911, four thousand marched, and then the number increased to somewhere between fifteen and twenty thousand in 1912. A 1913 march in Washington, D.C., was a true milestone event (even if repeatedly disrupted by rowdy crowds) and in New York, thirty thousand marched down Fifth Avenue that year.
By last year, there were coordinated marches all across the country, with the total number of participants as uncountable as the newspaper and magazine articles generated.
But while big suffrage parades have now become a tradition, there has never been anything quite like this, and there will be non-stop activity at all the suffrage groups headquarters until sometime tomorrow night when the last marcher finishes the route. Its not just a matter of getting a lot of people to walk down a street. Whats hard is to get them to march in an occupational, organizational or geographic group, and in many cases in a costume symbolizing it. There are also large banners still being made, floats being decorated, bands rehearsing, and automobiles being tuned.
. . .
http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/2014/10/22/today-in-1915-nyc-suffrage-parade-expected-to-include-45k-supporters/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 868 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Today in 1915: NYC Suffrage Parade Expected to Include 45K+ Supporters (Original Post)
niyad
Oct 2014
OP
niyad
(113,581 posts)1. can you imagine any of the pukes in today's congress doing this??
In Washington, D.C., the Congressional Union for Woman Suffrage announced that the Susan B. Anthony (nationwide woman suffrage) Amendment would be re-introduced on December 6th. Representative Frank Mondell, Republican of Wyoming and Senator George Sutherland, Republican of Utah, will do the honors. Senator Sutherland seemed especially supportive: