Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,587 posts)
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:27 PM Dec 2014

Today in Herstory: Suffragists Testify Before House During National Convention


Today in Herstory: Suffragists Testify Before House During National Convention


Helen H. Gardener, on the right, meeting with Alice Paul


December 3, 1913: An active, 12-hour workday for those attending the fifth day of the National American Woman Suffrage Association’s convention here in Washington, D.C.
Today’s first business was conducted outside the convention hall, as many prominent and articulate suffragists went to Capitol Hill at 10:30 to testify before the House Rules Committee in favor of establishing a Standing Committee on Woman Suffrage in the House.

Among today’s speakers were Reverend Anna Howard Shaw, Carrie Chapman Catt, Jane Addams and Ida Husted Harper, with Alva Belmont, Inez Milholland, Mary Ware Dennett and Alice Paul in the audience. Each speaker gave an excellent presentation showing why woman suffrage was now a movement of such national importance that it deserved its own permanent committee.
l



According to Helen H. Gardner:
For many years we have been sent before the Judiciary Committee once a year, if we so desired, to present our arguments for woman suffrage. We appear before it, year after year, one day for two hours, and that is the end of it. That committee is a very busy one. The President has notified it that it is to be still busier this session …. But the woman suffrage question is pressing for immediate solution.
Jane Addams was peppered with questions by a House member from Georgia who believed that “altering the electorate” was not a proper subject for discussion in Congress. Addams then proceeded to give him ten examples of when Congress had done exactly that.

A suggestion that “Woman Suffrage” be tacked on to the end of the name of the Committee on the Election of the President, Vice President and Representatives, was rejected by Rev. Shaw and the National American Woman Suffrage Association’s National Board. It’s believed that the proposal for a new committee now has majority support, and speculation that it might be established, then stacked with anti-suffragists is being discounted.

. . . .

http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/2014/12/03/today-in-herstory-suffragists-testify-before-house-during-national-convention/
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»Today in Herstory: Suffra...