Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Novara

(5,842 posts)
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 11:47 AM Jun 2015

What the Supreme Court’s marriage equality ruling means for reproductive rights

What the Supreme Court’s marriage equality ruling means for reproductive rights

There’s a little Easter egg in Friday’s marriage equality ruling that could have major repercussions for reproductive rights activists — if and when the Supreme Court takes up the issue of abortion again.

In his opinion for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy references the interplay of “personal choice” as it relates to same-sex marriage. But, in doing so, he also acknowledges the way individual autonomy relates to other life decisions, such as the right to use contraception or have a baby:

A first premise of the Court’s relevant precedents is that the right to personal choice regarding marriage is inherent in the concept of individual autonomy. …Like choices concerning contraception, family relationships, procreation, and childrearing, all of which are protected by the Constitution, decisions concerning marriage are among the most intimate that an individual can make.


Let’s string some things together here: “choices concerning contraception…procreation, and childrearing…are protected by the Constitution.” It’s a single line, but it’s no throwaway — especially not in a SCOTUS decision that affirms equal access to happiness and control over one’s own life. It could set a precedent that’s invaluable to the fight to secure reproductive rights once and for all.

http://www.salon.com/2015/06/26/what_the_supreme_courts_marriage_equality_ruling_means_for_reproductive_rights/
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What the Supreme Court’s marriage equality ruling means for reproductive rights (Original Post) Novara Jun 2015 OP
If all those are indeed equal why can states require a license to marry? n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2015 #1
A contract between two people needs documentation n/t eridani Jun 2015 #3
A 'license' is permission from the state, 'documentation' would just require PoliticAverse Jun 2015 #4
That's exactly what my marriage license was n/t eridani Jun 2015 #5
Good news, now let's assure our rights are No longer allowed to be taken AuntPatsy Jun 2015 #2
that is one hopefull sign. niyad Jun 2015 #6

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
4. A 'license' is permission from the state, 'documentation' would just require
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 12:34 PM
Jun 2015

something like a notarized statement be filed with the state.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»What the Supreme Court’s ...