Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Health
Related: About this forumCan Compact Fluorescent Lightbulbs Damage Skin?
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=can-compact-fluorescent-lightbulbs-damage-skinSKIN RISK: A new study finds that damaged compact fluorescent lightbulbs can emit harmful ultraviolet light capable of damaging skin cells.
Image: flickr/rubberpaw
The curlicue compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) oft touted as an Earth-friendly alternative to standard incandescent bulbs may cause skin damage, according to a new study by researchers at Stony Brook University.
The bulbs are already known to pose hazards from using mercury, a toxic element, though in very small quantities, as lighting manufacturers are quick to point out. Regulations in parts of the United States and in the European Union limit mercury to 3.5 milligrams per bulb, with the limit dropping to 2.5 mg next year.
Now researchers have found that ultraviolet radiation seeping through CFLs may damage skin cells. Miriam Rafailovich, a professor of materials science and engineering at Stony Brook, led the research after reading an article in an Israeli newspaper that reported a spike in skin cancer on a communal farm when residents switched to fluorescent bulbs.
"In the past two years some disturbing reports have surfaced mostly in the European Union literature, which indicate that exposure to CFL bulbs might be responsible for exacerbating certain skin conditions, such as photodermatoses and skin cancer in humans," says the paper, published last month in the journal Photochemistry and Photobiology.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1951 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can Compact Fluorescent Lightbulbs Damage Skin? (Original Post)
xchrom
Jul 2012
OP
The most disturbing part of this article is that the U.S. Dept. of Energy spent $252 million
snappyturtle
Jul 2012
#2
I suppose there will be an attack against all forms of arc welding next
LastDemocratInSC
Jul 2012
#6
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)1. Would if you bit one
Best avoided that.
Energy efficient they might be - light efficient they're not.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)2. The most disturbing part of this article is that the U.S. Dept. of Energy spent $252 million
in 2010 to promote CFL usage. I also smell government grant for the study.
Even more I find it remarkable that the scientist started this study because Israeli Commune
members on a FARM where there was a spike in skin cancer. I think the scientists are grabbing at straws.
imho
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)3. I smell Koch money.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)4. Are the Kochs into light bulbs too? nt
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)5. Probably. But mostly fossil fuels. The more wasted, the richer they become.
Response to ErikJ (Reply #5)
trotsky This message was self-deleted by its author.
LastDemocratInSC
(3,647 posts)6. I suppose there will be an attack against all forms of arc welding next
Arc welding emits gobs of ultraviolet radiation - so much that protection is needed if you're doing the work.
Are the "bulbers" (oh, I like that term) going to go nuts over welding as they have over CFL lamps?