Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,459 posts)
Mon Aug 29, 2022, 03:42 PM Aug 2022

9th Cir. holds 2-1 Fellowship of Christian Athletes school group likely to prevail on its challenge

IrreparablyCompromisedHat Retweeted

9th Cir., 2-1, holds Fellowship of Christian Athletes school group likely to prevail on its free exercise challenge to school district that excluded the group from status as an official student club.

Directs district court to grant prelim. injunction.
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2022/08/29/22-15827.pdf

School claimed FCA was only group that had discriminatory membership or leadership requirements—pointing to the group's disapproval of sex outside of straight marriage. Maj. op. points to school-approved women-only and "Asian-prioritized" groups to conclude that's not true.



Judge Lee, concurring, would go further and find an additional free exercise violation under Masterpiece Cakeshop since the record is replete with animus directed at Christians by teachers and staff.


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
9th Cir. holds 2-1 Fellowship of Christian Athletes school group likely to prevail on its challenge (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Aug 2022 OP
Better for the District to eliminate student clubs altogether J_William_Ryan Aug 2022 #1
I believe they have that wrong. Girard442 Aug 2022 #2
Christian Nationalism is America's greatest threat. walkingman Aug 2022 #3

J_William_Ryan

(1,753 posts)
1. Better for the District to eliminate student clubs altogether
Mon Aug 29, 2022, 03:55 PM
Aug 2022

rather than to be forced to tolerate rightwing Christo-fascist racism, bigotry, and hate.

Girard442

(6,075 posts)
2. I believe they have that wrong.
Mon Aug 29, 2022, 04:09 PM
Aug 2022

The text of 1A:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.



1A specifically states that government can discriminate against religion. There is no doctrine of separation of food and state, or separation of banking and state, or even separation of anal sex and state. Religion is singled out as something that government can't get entangled with. What this means is that when government is handing out goodies, it's specifically prohibited from handing out goodies to religious institutions -- but not prohibited from handing out goodies to, say, The Anal Sex Club. Free Astroglide!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»9th Cir. holds 2-1 Fellow...