Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumDozens of Gun Manufacturers Refusing to Sell to Some State/Local Governments
http://www.catholic.org/business/story.php?id=49870Some agencies have cancelled contracts altogether while others have said they will not sell anything that is illegal for citizens in a given state to posses. For example, if a particular firearm is illegal to posses in one state, then the weapons will not be sold to law enforcement either.
SNIP
List follows:
Olympic Arms, Inc
La Rue Tactical
EFI, LLC - Extreme Firepower
York Arms
Templar Custom
Cheaper Than Dirt
Barrett Firearms
Exile Machine
Tier One Arms
Bravo Company USA
Primary Weapons Systems
Crusader Weaponry
Top Gun Supply
Kiss Tactical
Clark Fork Tactical
OFA Tactical
One Source Tactical
Templar Tactical Arms
NEMO Arms
Old Grouch's Military Surplus
Big Horn Armory
Midway USA
CMMG Inc
Rocky Top Tactical
Badger Peak
Controlled Chaos Arms
SRT Arms
Norton Firearms
Citizen Arms
Evolution Weaponry
Doublestar Corp
JCW Industries
Huntertown Arms
Bullwater Enterprises
Westfork Armory
Smith Enterprise
Alex Arms
Spike's Tactical
Quality Arms
Liberty Suppressors
Doublestar Corp
American Spirit Arms
Trident Armory
Head Down Products
J&G Sales
This list continues to grow daily.
With the exception of Cheaper Than Dirt and Barrett, I don't see any major companies on the list. I suspect that most of them don't have any government contracts and are not sacrificing any business. Most are likely on there as a publicity stunt. Still it is an interesting development.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)I don't either! And Cheaper than Dirt and Barrett aren't big Law Enforcement suppliers either!
It's just little "bubba suppliers" throwing temper tantrums.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)It IS a news story, even though it is a minor story. Catholic Online was just the first one that popped up when I googled for the story. I try to avoid linking to FOX when I can.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)I can see why they would be so concerned with guns...
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)I only looked at the one story. It was at the top of the google page.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)And the question is not whether the story is true or false. The question is whether a number of minor gun manufacturers raising a fuss over gun laws deserves any attention.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)why don't show us why this story deserves our attention?
Have any of the listed companies ever had a contract to supply a state or local government with guns?
If so, if they were refuse to sell guns to any state or local government, would it have any effect on that government's function?
I suspect the answer to both questions is no and that the linked article is just blowing smoke.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)If you don't like the thread, appeal to the host for it to be locked.
It meets the purpose of the group: Discuss gun politics, gun control laws, the Second Amendment, the use of firearms for self-defense, and the use of firearms to commit crime and violence.
It is about gun politics.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)I won't waste my time alerting, but I will call it out as propaganda.
If you don't like that, then don't post right wing trash on DU.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)I heard about it in an email from my cousin, found it interesting, googled to find a story, and posted the first google link. Obviously you don't like Catholic Online, but until today I never heard of them. The second google link was to the same story in FOX and I didn't want to use them.
Settle down, you're getting your blood pressure too high.
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)And you still haven't told us why a statement by a group of small-time gun assembler/manufacturers with zero influence deserves attention?
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)You have never justified why a story you post deserves our attention and you show little to no concern about source quality for your posts. As I said, a classic PKB
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)Please provide a link to any right wing propaganda I have posted on DU.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)you cite regularly in your google dumps
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)and calling posts that you disagree with "google dumps" is infantile. I believe the member who started using that phrase is now banned.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)state and local LEO's when it's the "guns kill people" folks who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground that are proposing the latest round of pistol grips scare me laws.
They need to work within their respective states to gather opposition to more assaults on liberty.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Their line is more than most cop shops need, but most SWAT units have a Barret around "just in case".
I thought Magpul joined in. They do make the best AR mags out there. Vastly superior to most
ileus
(15,396 posts)Or PSA I'm not sure, both were back to back in DEC.
Midway is a top notch company to deal with IMHO, I've had nothing but great luck dealing with them. PSA, well their shipping leaves something to be desired.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)RIIIIIIIIGHT!!!!
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Generally on the command vehicle or truck. Its special equipment, they don't use it every time. Normally the sniper deploys with a 308 but more than a few departments have a Barret, mostly for stopping vehicles in extreme circumstances.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Name 'em!
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)LAPD
LACSD
SBCSD
SDPD
SDCSD
That leaves out Federal and State agencies not to mention the military. Other smaller departments have them too. They are fairly common. Like other heavy hardware, they are quite popular with PDs as they militarize.
rdharma
(6,057 posts)Barrett grand standing........ then accommodating!
Errrr merrrr Gerrrd!
BTW - Barrett won't say jack to the Feds............. he's playing to the "Bubba" market!
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)rdharma
(6,057 posts)Huh?!!!!!
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Not in a position to check and verify this AM
DonP
(6,185 posts)I had his letter somewhere for a year or two and can't find it now. But he did indeed cut off all agencies in the state from sales and service from his company, including parts. As far as I know his one-company boycott still stands.
Several of those "small companies" like Midway aren't so small and do a significant amount of government business with the Feds. A few years back when the Marine Recon units switched back to the 1911, the armorers bought all their parts for the rebuilds, barrels, bushings, new triggers, night sights etc. through one of these specialty companies in Alabama and had them shipped to Iraq and Afghanistan.
It stuck in my mind because the company's owner wrote a nice little article about getting an purchase order in the mail from the US Marine's armorers requesting specific components.
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)I'm sure that will bring NYC to its knees.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)If the politicians think that those weapons are dangerous, then the manufactures are agreeing to obey the law, and not sell to the state, even if the law allows sales to Law enforcement.
I think all gun laws should apply equally to Law enforcement as it does to law abiding civilians.
quadrature
(2,049 posts)to make this successful.
for example, Gun shows should
ban Glock, or I won't attend
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)In any states?