Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,899 posts)
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 07:24 PM Jul 2013

Missouri governor vetoes one gun bill, signs another

Source: Reuters

Missouri governor vetoes one gun bill, signs another

By Kevin Murphy
KANSAS CITY, Missouri | Fri Jul 5, 2013 5:52pm EDT

(Reuters) - Missouri Governor Jay Nixon on Friday vetoed a bill that would have called on the state to prosecute federal officials who attempt to enforce federal gun laws in Missouri and prohibit publication of the names of people owning guns.

Nixon also signed into law a bill allowing state employees to keep guns in state vehicles they use for work or on state property and permitting fire chiefs to carry concealed weapons.

Nixon, a Democrat, said the bill he vetoed was "unconstitutional" as it would nullify some federal gun laws and also infringe on rights of free speech by punishing anyone who published names of gun owners in Missouri.

Nixon noted that federal laws supersede state laws.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/05/us-usa-guns-missouri-idUSBRE96410220130705
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Missouri governor vetoes one gun bill, signs another (Original Post) Eugene Jul 2013 OP
He is correct in vetoing the one gejohnston Jul 2013 #1
Both choices were good ones. n/t protect our future Jul 2013 #2
Good for him on both counts! rdharma Jul 2013 #3

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
1. He is correct in vetoing the one
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 07:36 PM
Jul 2013

IIRC, Wisconsin and other states did use nullification in the 1850s but the law then, IIRC, required local authorities to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act. Today, there is no requirement to do the ATF's or DEA's job for them.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Missouri governor vetoes ...